[misc.consumers.house] pesticides

harolds1@ihlpa.ATT.COM (Schessler) (08/10/87)

Silent Spring Still Flows ....

	    Springtime is  spraying  time.   The  peak	season	for
       dispensing  an annual 2.5 billion pounds	of pesticides means
       that  the  United  States,  the	earth's	 most  chemicalized
       landscape,  is again to have its	farms, homes, lawns, ground
       water and food supply awash in poisons.

	    This year  is  different  because  it  marks  the  25th
       anniversary  of "Silent Spring,"	the Rachel Carson book that
       told of the chemical plague under way  in  1962	and  warned
       that it was likely to worsen.

	    It has.  If	a successor to Rachel Carson, who  died	 in
       1964,  were  to	write  "Silent Spring II," the sequel could
       have as its subtitle:  "We Aimed	at  the	 Bugs  but  Sprayed
       Ourselves."

	    One	problem	 with  chemicals  is  that  once  they	are
       applied	to  the	 land,	air  or	water, it is scientifically
       difficult to prove a causal relationship	between	the poisons
       and  diseases  suffered	by  humans.   The chemical industry
       takes refuge in this  handy  uncertainty.   It  argues  that
       pesticides  are potentially dangerous but, if used properly,
       heighten	the quality of life.

	    Rachel Carson rejected that	bromide	25 years  ago,	and
       it's  not  worth	 an  empty can of roach	spray now.  How	can
       pesticides be properly used if the effects of  what's  being
       used  are  a  mystery?	Jay  Feldman,  the  director of	the
       National	Coalition Against the Misuse of	Pesticides, reports
       that as recently	as five	years ago, "79 to 84 percent lacked
       adequate	carcinogenicity	 testing,  and	60  to	70  percent
       lacked  adequate	 mutagenicity  testing,	 90  to	 93 percent
       lacked adequate testing for their tendency  to  cause  birth
       defects."   More	 recently, in 1984, the	National Academy of
       Sciences	found that "complete health-hazard assessments	for
       pesticides  and inert ingredients of pesticides formulations
       are possible for	only 10	percent	of the pesticides in use."

	    Those  facts  should  have	been  calls  to	 action	 by
       governmental enforcers of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide
       and Rodenticide Act.  Instead, the legislation -- passed	 in
       1972  and  known	 as  the weakest of the	major environmental
       laws enacted in the last	15 years -- was	 applied  with	all
       the  force of trying to stop a swarm of locusts with a spray
       of milk.	 Two reports last year from the	General	 Accounting
       Office  documented  that	the Environmental Protection Agency
       was a regulatory	wasteland regarding pesticides:	The  agency
       knows  little about "the	nature,	frequency, amount or extent
       of" exposure to the 1.5 billion	pounds	of  nonagricultural
       poisons used annually.

	    A more recent GAO report found that	the Food  and  Drug
       Administration's	  pesticide-monitoring	 program  "provides
       limited	protection  against  public  exposure  to   illegal
       residues	 in  food."   Fewer  than  1  percent  of 1 million
       imported	 food  shipments  are  sampled.	  This	means  that
       Americans  eating  fruit,  vegetables  or  meat	from,  say,
       Central or South	America, may well be dining  on	 pesticide-
       laden  food.   In "Altered Harvest," Jack Doyle writes about
       the ethics of American corporations: Eighteen  of  them	now
       "produce	 or  sell  in Third World countries pesticides that
       are either banned, heavily restricted, or  under	 review	 in
       the United States."

	    A poisonous	equation is created.  We make  a  buck	off
       the  poor  and they get the last	laugh -- a deadly one -- on
       us.  It's the new Montezuma's revenge.

	    Rachel Carson could	not  have  possibly  imagined  that
       pesticide  production  would  increase  400 percent by 1987.
       Nor could she have predicted the	 government's  indifference
       to  the	dangers.   She	wrote  in "Silent Spring" about	the
       health and safety hazards of chlordane, an insecticide  made
       by  Velsicol  Chemical  Corp., a	Chicago	firm that sought in
       1962 to block publication  of  Carson's	book.	In  it	she
       quoted  the  FDA'a  chief  pharmacologist  as saying that he
       considered "the hazard of living	in  a  house  sprayed  with
       chlordane to be `very great.'"

	    Last month,	citing scientific evidence against the same
       pesticide  --  still  sold  for	use in millions	of American
       homes --	 the  National	Coalition  Against  the	 Misuse	 of
       Pesticides petitioned EPA to ban	the product.  It is already
       outlawed	in New York,  Massachusetts  and  Japan.   Velsicol
       denied  the  charges  that  its product is a danger, and	its
       judgment	seems suitable to  EPA,	 which	is  permitting	its
       continued use.

	    In the 25 years  since  "Silent  Spring"  first  warned
       about  chlordane,  and  a warehouseful of other poisons,	not
       much  has  changed  politically.	  The  industry	 is   still
       winning,	 the  public  still  losing, and the government	not
       caring much either way.


					Colman Mccarthy
					Washington Post
					April 19, 1987