[sci.med] Superconductivity implications for biological molecules

lincoln@randvax.UUCP (Tom Lincoln) (06/30/87)

The following description of a recent meeting is submitted in its entirety:

At Los Alamos recently, a physic colloquium was presented by Dr.
David Pines of U-Illinois at Urbanna.  He is one of the leading researchers
in superconductivity, and his presentation was beautifully articulated and
comprehensible even if one is not a particle physicist.

He summarize the state of knowledge in superconductivity, and pointed out
that a particular pairing mechanism (betweene electrons) which was
responsible for the original low temperature superconductivity is only
one of many pairing mechanisms that can lead to the phenomenon. There
are about 8 on the current list of theories, and he anticipates that
others will be found. There is a competition among the theories for
explaining high temperature superconductivity, and for pointing the
direction to new compounds.

Surprisingly, all compounds that exhibit high temperature
superconductivity contain copper oxide (CuO).  It is not known why this
must be so, but substitution of Zn for the Cu kills the behavior.  At the
moment, is is not known whether other metals might be substituted for the
Cu and still have superconductivity.

He predicts the development of materials that are superconducting at
ever higher temperatures and believes that room-temperature ones will
be discovered within a decade.

His most tantalizing and exciting comment was almost a throw away -- the
last line on his last chart.  He believes that superconductivity is
possible in room-temperature biomolecules, and suggests that the several
pairing mechanisms may prove to be important explanations for some of
the behavior and chemistry of biological systems, especially that of
neural nets.

TOM LINCOLN     lincoln@rand-unix.arpa