[sci.med] HICN226 News Part 2/3

ATW1H%ASUACAD.BITNET@oac.ucla.edu (Dr David Dodell) (06/28/89)

--- begin part 2 of 3 cut here ---
were treated before they got sick.

   Rogers  and  colleagues  at  six  New York hospitals tested the new method,
known as polymerase chain reaction, or PCR, on newborns of women infected with
the AIDS virus. They report their results in Thursday's New England Journal of
Medicine.

   Ordinarily,  doctors check for AIDS infections by  testing  the  blood  for
antibodies  to  the  virus.  Those  who  carry  antibodies  are presumed to be
infected.

   This method is worthless for newborns.  Babies whose mothers were  infected
will  carry  their  mothers'  AIDS antibodies for several months,  even if the
babies themselves are not infected.

   Dr.  Cody Meissner of New England Medical Center said doctors now typically
wait  until  babies  are 16 months old before using standard antibody tests to
determine which ones are infected.

   "This will be the key role of PCR," he said.  "We will be able to do a test
on  the  baby's  blood  in  the  first weeks of life,  and hopefully this will
differentiate between kids who are truly infected and hose who are simply born
to women who are infected."

   The test locates minute bits of the  genes  of  viruses  that  have  gotten
inside  blood  cells.  It  then multiplies these gene fragments so they can be
detected.

   In the study,  the test revealed AIDS infections in five of seven  newborns
who  later  developed AIDS.  It also showed infection in one of eight newborns
who later had non-specific symptoms, such as swollen lymph glands,  that could
have  been  caused  by the AIDS virus.  The test results were negative in nine
infants who remained well.

   In an accompanying editorial in  the  journal,  Drs.  Samuel  L.  Katz  and
Catherine  M.  Wilfert of Duke University said positive test results should be
reliable.  But they cautioned  that  negative  results  are  less  believable,

Health InfoCom Network News                                             Page 10
Volume  2, Number 26                                            June 26, 1989

because the test may miss youngsters who are truly infected.

   While  childhood AIDS is rare in the United States,  it is becoming a major
health hazard in parts of Africa.  Another report in the journal  describes  a
study  of  475  infants  who were born to infected mothers at two hospitals in
Zaire.  The research,  directed by Dr.  Robert W.  Ryder of the Department  of
Public  Health  in  Kinshasa,  concludes  that AIDS may already have increased
infant mortality there by as much as 15 percent.

   A third study,  directed by Dr.  Stephane Blanche  of  Necker  Hospital  in
Paris, presented more circumstantial evidence that breast-feeding may increase
the AIDS risk for newborns.  Among babies of infected mothers, they found AIDS
infections in five of six infants who were breast-fed,  compared with 25 of 99
who were not.

   They  cautioned  that further studies are necessary "before infants at risk
in developing countries are deprived of the advantages of breast-feeding."

          AIDS RISING AMONG HETEROSEXUALS, BUT ONLY FRACTION OF CASES

  Transmission of AIDS among heterosexuals in the United States is increasing,
but still represents only a tiny portion of all AIDS cases, according to a new
report from the U.S. Centres for Disease Control.

   About five per cent of all adults with AIDS in the United States contracted
the disease by engaging in sexual activity with  an  infected  person  of  the
opposite  sex  --  a figure which has remained constant in the past two years,
according to the report released on Thursday.

   Because the number of  people  who  have  contracted  the  disease  through
homosexual  sex  and  intravenous  drug use is vastly larger than the cases of
heterosexual transmission,  even the 80 per cent increase  in  the  number  of
heterosexual  cases  in  the  last two years is not large enough to affect the
overall  proportions,  according  to  Dr.  Mary  E.   Chamberland,  a  medical
epidemiologist in the CDC's AIDS programme.

   The   only  category  of  new  AIDS  cases  increasing  more  quickly  than
heterosexual sex is intravenous drug use where new cases increased at  a  rate
of 109 per cent in 1987 and 1988, according to Chamberland.

   In  1987 and 1988,  new cases of AIDS attributed to homosexual transmission
increased only at a rate of 33 per cent.

   Among the heterosexual group in the report, women were more likely than men
to become infected.  Some 1,953 women have  contracted  AIDS  by  engaging  in
sexual  relations  with  infected  men while only 672 men were infected in the
same way.  That statistic does not include some 1,000 male and 337 female AIDS
victims   who  were  born  in  Africa  or  Haiti  and  other  countries  where
heterosexual transmission is far more common.

   Both women and men report most commonly that they had sexual relations with
an infected intravenous drug user.

   "Clearly that's  the  single  most  important  category  of  transmission,"

Health InfoCom Network News                                             Page 11
Volume  2, Number 26                                            June 26, 1989

Chamberland  said.  "I think that's a very important message from this report.
More than than 70 per cent of the sex partners of this group were  intravenous
drug users."

Health InfoCom Network News                                             Page 12
Volume  2, Number 26                                            June 26, 1989

===============================================================================
                      Center for Disease Control Reports
===============================================================================

                     Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                            Thursday  June 22, 1989

                        Epidemiologic Notes and Reports
              Multiple Outbreaks of Staphylococcal Food Poisoning
                          Caused by Canned Mushrooms

    Recent outbreaks of staphylococcal foodborne disease have been  associated
with  consumption  of  canned  mushrooms  from  the People's Republic of China
(PRC).  These outbreaks have prompted multistate recalls of mushrooms produced
by certain canneries in the PRC and a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) order
to  prohibit  entry  into  the  United  States  of  all  incoming shipments of
institution-sized cans of mushrooms  from  the  PRC.  The  following  reported
outbreaks in 1989 led to these actions.
    Starkville,  Mississippi.  On  February  13,  22  persons  became ill with
gastroenteritis  several  hours  after  eating  at  a  university   cafeteria.
Symptoms  included  nausea,  vomiting,  diarrhea,  and abdominal cramps.  Nine
persons were hospitalized. Canned mushrooms served with omelets and hamburgers
were associated with illness.  No deficiencies in food  handling  were  found.
Staphylococcal  enterotoxin was identified in a sample of implicated mushrooms
from the omelet bar and in unopened cans from the same lot.
    Queens,  New York.  On February 28,  48 persons became ill a median  of  3
hours  after  eating  lunch  in a hospital employee cafeteria.  One person was
hospitalized.  Canned mushrooms served at the salad bar were epidemiologically
implicated. Two unopened cans of mushrooms from the same lot as the implicated
can contained staphylococcal enterotoxin.
    McKeesport,  Pennsylvania.  On  April  17,  12  persons  became  ill  with
gastroenteritis a median of  2  hours  after  eating  lunch  or  dinner  at  a
restaurant. Two persons were hospitalized. Canned mushrooms, consumed on pizza
or with a parmigiana sauce, were associated with illness. No deficiencies were
found in food preparation or storage.  Staphylococcal enterotoxin was found in
samples of remaining mushrooms and in unopened cans from the same lot.
    Philipsburg,  Pennsylvania.  On April 22,  20  persons  developed  illness
several  hours  after eating food from a take-out pizzeria.  Four persons were
hospitalized.  Only pizza served with canned  mushrooms  was  associated  with
illness.  Staphylococcal  enterotoxin  was found in a sample of mushrooms from
the pizzeria and in unopened cans with the same lot number.
    Three other outbreaks possibly associated with mushrooms from the PRC have
been reported to CDC;  cans associated with these outbreaks have codes similar
to those in the four confirmed outbreaks.

Reported  by:   RK  Collins,  Mississippi  State  University,  Starkville;  MN
Henderson, Oktibbeha County Health Dept;  DE Conwill, MD, MM Currier,  MD,  FE
Thompson,  MD,  State  Epidemiologist,  Mississippi  State Dept of Health.  ME
Garland,  Peninsula Hospital Center,  Queens;  S Schultz,  MD,  New York  City
Health Department;  JJ Campana, Monroe County Dept of Health;  LD Budnick, MD,
JJ Guzewich, MPH, DL Morse, MD,  State Epidemiologist,  New York State Dept of
Health;  MJ Diskin,  MPH,  TL Hays,  JA Kail,  JR Rager,  MPH,  RR Willenpart,
Allegheny County Health Dept;  G Wells,  Dept of Environmental  Resources;  AS
Trentini,  JM Zimmerman,  J Crumrine,  GE Ware, M Dorman, DR Tavris, MD, State
Epidemiologist,   Pennsylvania  State  Dept  of  Health.   Atlanta,   Buffalo,

Health InfoCom Network News                                             Page 13
Volume  2, Number 26                                            June 26, 1989

Nashville,  New Orleans,  Newark, New York District Offices;  Div of Emergency
and Epidemiologic Operations;  Div of Food Chemistry and  Technology;  Div  of
Microbiology; Office of Compliance, Food and Drug Administration. Div of Field
Svcs,  Epidemiology  Program  Office;  Enteric  Diseases Br,  Div of Bacterial
Diseases, Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC.

Editorial Note:  Staphylococcal enterotoxin typically causes an acute  illness
2-4  hours  after  ingestion;  illness  is  characterized by severe nausea and
vomiting,  often accompanied by  abdominal  cramps,  diarrhea,  and  low-grade
fever,  and  resolves  within  1-2  days.  Staphylococcal  enterotoxin  is not
inactivated by temperatures used in canning and cooking. Finding this toxin in
cans means that staphylococci grew and produced enterotoxin in  the  mushrooms
before canning or that staphylococci contaminated the mushrooms after canning,
possibly  through  improperly  formed seams.  From 1982 to 1987,  75 confirmed
staphylococcal outbreaks were reported to  CDC's  national  foodborne  disease
surveillance system; none of these outbreaks were associated with deficiencies
in canning.
    All  cans  implicated  in  these  mushroom-associated outbreaks were large
institution-sized (68-ounce, drained weight (#10)) cans of pieces and stems of
mushrooms produced in the PRC and shipped through Hong Kong. FDA is monitoring
the voluntary recall of shipments  of  cans  that  have  codes  implicated  in
outbreaks.  Cans  from  lots  associated  with illness have lids embossed with
three-line codes with the plant identifiers "TM" on the first line or "T3"  or
"M2"  on  the second line.  FDA is prohibiting entry into the United States of
all shipments of mushrooms from the PRC in #10  cans  because  the  source  of
contamination  has not been identified and cans produced by other plants might
also be involved.  FDA has begun sampling mushrooms imported from the  PRC  in
all  can sizes,  including consumer-sized cans.  FDA has offered to assist the
PRC in an investigation of the sources of contamination.
    The United States imports approximately 50  million  pounds  of  processed
mushrooms from the PRC annually. Many other countries also import canned foods
from the PRC.  Since the canned mushrooms are widely distributed, other canned
mushroom-associated outbreaks may have occurred.  Possible outbreaks should be
reported  through  state  health  departments  to the Enteric Diseases Branch,
Division of Bacterial Diseases,  Center for Infectious Diseases,  CDC  (  FAX:
(404) 639-3296, Telex: 549571 CDC ATL).

Health InfoCom Network News                                             Page 14
Volume  2, Number 26                                            June 26, 1989

                              International Notes
                       Dengue Epidemic -- Ecuador, 1988

    A  large  dengue 1 (DEN-1) epidemic occurred in Guayaquil,  Ecuador,  from
late February through April 1988. The Virology Laboratory, Ecuadorian National
Institute of Hygiene, detected antidengue hemagglutination-inhibition antibody
in serum specimens from persons with viral syndromes  who  had  visited  local
health  centers  in Guayaquil during February and March.  Dengue infection was
subsequently confirmed by CDC through serologic testing and isolation of DEN-1
virus from nine specimens.
    From May 14 to May 19,  1988,  a population-based cluster  serosurvey  was
conducted in eight of Guayaquil's 14 parishes,  representing 72% of the city's
population. Serum collected from 1340 persons in 280 households was tested for
antidengue IgM antibody  using  an  IgM-capture,  enzyme-linked  immunosorbent
assay  (MAC-ELISA).  Before  DEN-1 was recognized as the infecting serotype of
the epidemic,  approximately half the specimens were screened  using  a  mixed
(DEN  1-4)  antigen.  Specimens from this group with equivocal results and all
subsequent samples  were  then  tested  using  DEN-1  antigen.  Based  on  the
resulting area-specific seropositivity rates, an estimated 420,000 individuals
were infected with dengue during the epidemic.
    Responses  to  a  standard  clinical questionnaire from a subsample of 106
IgM-seropositive persons  reflected  a  pattern  of  illness  consistent  with
classic dengue fever. Fever was reported by 105 (99%) of this group. More than
50% of the subsample reported one or more of the following symptoms: headache,
chills,  pruritus, rash, myalgias, and arthralgias;  12 (11%) persons reported
hemorrhagic manifestations.  Review of  data  at  the  National  Institute  of
Hygiene and discharge records from a major tertiary hospital for severe dengue
illness detected only one case of severe hemorrhagic disease and no deaths.
    In  an  entomologic  survey  done  concurrently  with the serosurvey,  the
highest Aedes aegypti indices (container,  8.1% and  8.7%;  house,  13.5%  and
18.7%;  and  Breteau,  23.1  and  26.3)  were  in two of the parishes with the
highest dengue attack rates.  In  another  parish  with  high  seropositivity,
however,  low  mosquito  indices  were detected,  probably as a consequence of
intensive larval mosquito-control efforts  implemented  after  infections  had
occurred but before the entomologic survey.
    Weekly  surveillance data from public clinics indicated that the number of
patients with acute febrile illness increased during March and  peaked  during
the  week  ending  April  2.  Most  onsets of illness reported by IgM-positive
persons in Febres Cordero and Letamendi parishes occurred in mid-April (Figure
1). At the time of the entomologic and serologic surveys, few persons reported
current dengue-like illness.  Thus,  the epidemic appeared to have subsided by
mid-May.  An  intradomiciliary  fumigation  campaign for Ae.  aegypti control,
involving approximately 350,000 houses,  was conducted from May 27 to July 29,
after the epidemic had subsided.

Reported  by:  National  Institute  of  Hygiene,  National Malaria Eradication
Service  and  Region  II  Epidemiology  Office,  Ministry  of  Health;  Guayas
Provincial Health Department,  Guayaquil,  Ecuador.  Dengue Br, Div of Vector-
Borne Viral Diseases, Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC.

Editorial Note:  In 1948, an Ae.  aegypti eradication program for yellow fever
control was initiated in Ecuador in collaboration with the Pan-American Health
Organization (PAHO);  by 1958, the country was declared free of this mosquito.
As in many other countries in the Americas,  however,  surveillance  declined,
and  reinfestation occurred.  Ae.  aegypti was detected in a province north of

Health InfoCom Network News                                             Page 15
Volume  2, Number 26                                            June 26, 1989

Guayaquil in 1977 and 1981  and  in  central  Guayaquil  in  1985.  No  dengue
transmission  was  reported  in  Guayaquil  from  1958  until  1988,  although
unreported transmission may have occurred before 1958 (1).
    In  response  to  the  1988  epidemic,  mosquito-control  efforts  by  the
Ecuadoran  National  Malaria  Eradication Service included 1) vehicle-applied,
ultralow-volume (ULV) insecticide (malathion) spraying, 2) source reduction by
elimination of larval habitats,  and 3) treatment of water-holding  containers
with  temephos insecticide.  These measures may have contributed to decreasing
transmission, although their effect cannot be evaluated retrospectively. Given
the high seropositivity rates in areas heavily infested with Ae.  aegypti, the
epidemic probably ended because much of the population had become immune.
    This  epidemic  and  others  in Brazil (2),  Bolivia,  and Paraguay (PAHO,
unpublished data)  illustrate  the  increasing  problem  of  dengue  fever  in
tropical  America.  The  epidemics  also demonstrate the vulnerability of many
large  urban  centers  in  Central  and  South  America  to  explosive  dengue
epidemics.  Increased  travel  between  countries  in  the  Americas and other
regions of the world heightens the risk for repeated introduction of different
virus strains and serotypes.  These factors,  in turn,  increase the risk  for
dengue  epidemics,  and possibly for epidemics of dengue hemorrhagic fever and
urban yellow fever.
    In the absence of Ae.  aegypti eradication,  large dengue and yellow fever
epidemics  can  be  prevented  only through programs that combine surveillance
with integrated vector-control programs.  While ground-applied ULV insecticide
has  been  recommended  to  control  epidemic  dengue  (3),  recent studies in
Trinidad (4),  Suriname (5),  and Puerto Rico (CDC,  unpublished data) suggest
that  these measures are ineffective in reducing adult Ae.  aegypti densities.
Ultimately,  control of this mosquito must  be  community-based  and  directed
toward larval source reduction (6).

References

1.  Carbo-Noboa  JM.  Etiologia  del dengue.  Ann Soc Medico-Cirug del Guayas,
Guayaquil, Ecuador 1924;4:326.

2.  Schatzmayr HG,  Nogueira RM,  Travassos da Rosa AP.  An outbreak of dengue
virus at Rio de Janeiro-1986. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1986;81:245-6.

3.  CDC.  Biology and control of Aedes aegypti. Vector topics No. 4, September
1979.

4.  Chadee DD.  An evaluation of malathion ultralow  volume  spraying  against
caged and natural populations of Aedes aegypti in Trinidad,  West Indies.  Cah
Orstom ser Ent med et Parasitol 1985;23:71-4.

5. Hudson JE.  The 1982 emergency ultralow volume spray campaign against Aedes
aegypti adults in Paramaribo, Suriname. PAHO Bull 1986;20:294-303.

6.  Gubler  DJ.  Aedes  aegypti and Aedes aegypti-borne disease control in the
1990s: top down or bottom up. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1989;40 (in press).

Health InfoCom Network News                                             Page 16
Volume  2, Number 26                                            June 26, 1989

     Perspectives in Disease Promotion and Health Promotion Prevalence of
        Overweight -- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1987

    An  estimated  34  million adults in the United States are overweight (1),
placing them  at  increased  risk  for  chronic  diseases  such  as  diabetes,
hypertension, and some types of cancer (2,3). Thus, reducing the prevalence of
overweight is an important public health objective.
    To examine patterns of overweight adults by geographic location, data from
the  1987  Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (4) were used to
obtain prevalence estimates for  32  states  and  the  District  of  Columbia.
Participating states were divided into four regions (West,  Northeast,  South,
and Midwest) based on the 1984 census divisions (5).
    In the BRFSS,  state health departments collect data  on  behavioral  risk
factors  using random-digit-dialed telephone interviews of adults greater than
or equal to 18 years of age. Prevalence estimates, obtained from self-reported
weights and heights in BRFSS interviews,  are adjusted to the  age,  sex,  and
race distribution of each state's population.
    Overweight  was  defined  as a body mass index (BMI=weight(kg)/height(m)2)
greater than or equal to 27.8 for men and greater than or equal  to  27.3  for
women. These values represent the sex-specific 85th percentile of BMI for U.S.
adults  aged  20-29  years,  estimated  from  the  Second  National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II) (1).
    Overall,  the prevalence of overweight ranged from  a  high  of  25.7%  in
Wisconsin  and  Indiana to a low of 15.2% in New Mexico (Table 1).  Among men,
the prevalence of overweight ranged  from  26.9%  in  Wisconsin  to  15.1%  in
Arizona.  For  women,  the  prevalence  ranged  from  25.8% in the District of
Columbia to 13.7% in Hawaii. The median prevalence of overweight was 21.8% for
men and 21.1% for women.
    The median prevalence of overweight by  region  was  lowest  in  the  West
(17.0%), followed by the Northeast (19.8%), the South (22.0%), and the Midwest
(23.1%).  Adjusting for regional population distribution by age, sex, and race
did not change this pattern. Compared with the median prevalence of overweight
for all 33 participating units (21.1%),  the median prevalence  by  region  is
lower in the West and Northeast and higher in the South and Midwest.

Reported by:  The state BRFSS coordinators:  R Strickland, Alabama;  T Hughes,
Arizona;  L Parker,  California;  M Rivo,  District of Columbia;  S  Hoecherl,
Florida;  JD  Smith,  Georgia;E  Tash,  Hawaii;  J Mitten,  Idaho;  B Steiner,
Illinois;  S Joseph, Indiana;  K Bramblett,  Kentucky;  R Schwartz,  Maine;  A
Weinstein, Maryland;  L Koumijian Yandel, Massachusetts; N Salem, Minnesota; N
Hudson, Missouri; R Moon, Montana; R Thurber, Nebraska; K Zaso, New Hampshire;
L Pendley, New Mexico;  H Bzduch, New York;  C Washington,  North Carolina;  L
Post, South Dakota;  D Riding, Tennessee; J Fellows, Texas; C Chakley, Utah; K
Tollestrup, Washington; R Anderson, West Virginia; R Miller, Wisconsin. Div of
Nutrition and Office of Surveillance and Analysis,  Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

Editorial   Note:   The  prevalence  of  overweight  in  this  report  may  be
underestimated because the data are based  on  self-reported  responses.  When
measured  weights and heights from NHANES II were used,  an estimated 24.2% of
men and 27.1% of women in the United States were overweight (1), compared with
21.8% of men and 21.1% of women from BRFSS.  Assuming that the underestimation
of overweight does not differ by state or region,  findings of this report can
be used to make relative comparisons of the prevalence of  overweight  between
states and regions.

Health InfoCom Network News                                             Page 17
Volume  2, Number 26                                            June 26, 1989

    State  and  regional variations in the prevalence of overweight may result
from differences in eating habits and exercise practices (6,7).  A  number  of
states  have  reached  low  prevalence  levels  of  overweight.  Public health
agencies should encourage moderate but regular physical activity  and  caloric
restriction through decreased dietary fat consumption in weight-loss programs.
These efforts are of special importance in states with the highest prevalences
of overweight.

References

1.  NCHS.  Anthropometric reference data and prevalence of overweight,  United
States 1976-1980.  Hyattsville,  Maryland:  US Department of Health and  Human
Services,  Public  Health Service,  1987;  DHHS publication no.  (PHS)87-1688.
(Data from the National Health Survey; series 11, no. 238).

2.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel  on  the  Health
Implications of Obesity.  Health implications of obesity:  National Institutes
of  Health  consensus  development  conference  statement.   Ann  Intern   Med
1985;103(6 pt 2):1073-7.

3. Office on Smoking and Health. The Surgeon General's report on nutrition and
health.  Washington,  DC:  US  Department  of Health and Human Services;  DHHS
publication no. (PHS)88-50210:275-309.

4.  Remington PL, Smith MY, Williamson DF, Anda RF,  Gentry,  EM.  Hogelin GC.
Design,  characteristics, and usefulness of state-based behavioral risk factor
surveillance: 1981-1987. Public Health Rep 1988;103:366-75.

5. US Department of Commerce.  Factfinder for the nation.  Census geography --
concepts and products.  Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, 1985. (CFF No. 8
Rev.).

6.  Council on Scientific  Affairs.  Treatment  of  obesity  in  adults.  JAMA
1988;260:2547-51.

7.  Black  W,  James WPT,  Besser GM,  et al.  Obesity:  a report of the Royal
College of Physicians. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1983;17:5-65.

Health InfoCom Network News                                             Page 18
Volume  2, Number 26                                            June 26, 1989

                                Current Trends
                     Update: Heterosexual Transmission of
                    Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and
            Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection -- United States

    This report updates data for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and
human immunodeficiency virus  (HIV)  infection  associated  with  heterosexual
transmission  and  is based on national AIDS surveillance,  HIV seroprevalence
surveys, and studies of populations at varying levels of risk for heterosexual
transmission.  HETEROSEXUALLY ACQUIRED AIDS CASES
    By March 31,  1989,  89,501 AIDS cases in persons greater than or equal to
13  years of age had been reported to CDC;  3962 (4%) of these were attributed
to heterosexual transmission.  Forty-one percent of heterosexual  transmission
cases were reported in the preceding 12 months, compared with 36% of all other
AIDS  cases.  Of  the heterosexualtransmission cases,  1337 (34%) persons were
born in countries where heterosexual transmission is  a  major  route  of  HIV
infection;  2625  (66%)  persons  reported heterosexual contact with a partner
with or at increased risk  for  HIV  infection  (Table  1,  page  429).  These
heterosexual contacts included intravenous-drug users (IVDUs) (72%),  bisexual
men (10%),  recipients of blood or clotting factor concentrates (3%),  persons
born   in   countries  where  heterosexual  contact  is  the  major  route  of
transmission (2%),  and persons with HIV infection or AIDS and  an  unreported
risk (13%). Men were proportionately more likely than women to report partners
from  countries  where heterosexual contact is the major route of transmission
(5%, compared with 1%) or partners with an unreported risk (19%, compared with
11%).
    While the number of heterosexually acquired AIDS cases reported each  year
has  increased,  the  overall  proportion has remained relatively stable--from
5.2% of adult AIDS cases reported in  1983  to  4.9%  in  1988.  However,  the
composition of the group has changed over time;  since 1986, persons reporting
sexual contact with a partner at risk have  outnumbered  HIV-infected  persons
born in countries with predominantly heterosexual HIV transmission (Figure 1).
>From 1987 to 1988, the percentage increase for heterosexually transmitted AIDS
among  persons born in countries where heterosexual contact is the major route
of transmission was 41%, compared with a 97% increase for persons with an "at-
risk" partner.
    Of the 2625 persons with an "at-risk" partner, 672 (26%) were men and 1953
(74%) were women,  representing 0.8% and 25% of AIDS cases in  all  males  and
females, respectively.  Men were older than women (mean age: 40, compared with
34 years,  respectively).  Forty-seven percent  were  black,  29%  white,  23%
Hispanic,  0.6%  Asian  Pacific  Islander,  and  0.2%  American Indian/Alaskan
Native.  In the 12 months before March 31, 1989,  blacks and Hispanics had the
highest incidences of heterosexually acquired AIDS per 100,000 population: 3.1
and  3.5,  respectively,  for  women and 1.9 and 0.8,  respectively,  for men,
compared with 0.3  and  0.2  cases  per  100,000  for  white  women  and  men,
respectively.  Overall,  rates  for blacks and Hispanics were 12 and 10 times,
respectively, the rate for whites.
    Forty-six states,  the District of Columbia,  Puerto Rico,  and the Virgin
Islands  have reported AIDS cases in persons who had heterosexual contact with
an "at-risk" partner.  The geographic distributions  of  women  who  were  sex
partners of bisexual men or men who used IV drugs were similar to those of men
with AIDS from these two groups (Table 2A and 2B). In contrast, the geographic
distribution of men who reported heterosexual contact with a woman who used IV
drugs  was  different  from that of women with AIDS who were IVDUs (Table 2C).
For example, New York accounted for 40% of female IVDUs with AIDS but for only

Health InfoCom Network News                                             Page 19
Volume  2, Number 26                                            June 26, 1989

4% of men who  reported  sexual  contact  with  a  female  IVDU,  and  Florida
accounted  for  25% of men reporting IV-drug-using partners but for only 9% of
female  IVDUs  with  AIDS.

         HETEROSEXUAL  TRANSMISSION  OF  HIV  IN  SURVEYED POPULATIONS

    Risk   for   HIV  transmission  from  infected  persons  to  their  steady
heterosexual partners without other risks varied in 26 studies  that  included
at least 20 couples each;  in heterosexual partners, HIV seroprevalence ranged
from 0 to 58% (median: 24%) (1,2).
    Female prostitutes are at increased risk  for  acquisition  and  potential
transmission  of  HIV  infection.  In  the  United  States,  HIV  infection in
prostitutes is strongly associated with IV-drug use. In a multicity study, HIV
antibody was detected in 180 (13%) of 1378  female  prostitutes;  80%  of  the
infected  prostitutes  reported  using  IV  drugs (3).  In prostitutes with no
histories or findings suggestive of IV-drug use,  HIV seroprevalence  was  5%;
HIV  seropositivity  in  this group was greater among blacks and Hispanics and
among those with greater than 200 lifetime nonpaying sex partners.
    Seroprevalence data are limited for heterosexuals who are not sex partners
of persons known to be infected or at increased risk.  Data  on  heterosexuals
--- end part 2 of 3 cut here ---