[sci.med] sci.med.prevent

wells@disk.UUCP (Lee Wells) (01/08/90)

I would like to know if there are any interested parties in forming
a subgroup in sci.med to deal with preventive medicine.

In case you are wondering, yes, this is the same person who was trying
to start the lifex mailing list, but I am still trying to get the bugs
out of doing multiple mailings.

if I have missed a group (even an alt. group) that deals with this 
please let me know. 

I realize there are a lot of opinions out there, but if Pink Floyd rates
a group, I figure stopping the aging process might also.
-- 
Lee Wells (pick one address)        wells@disk.UUCP	
DISK Inc. [a Nixpub machine]        att!chinet!mcdchg!ddsw1!corpane!disk!wells
502 968 5401 to 5406 [modems]       uunet!ukma!corpane!disk!wells
Louisville, Kentucky U.S.A.         arpa!e.ms.uky.edu!corpane!disk!wells	

geb@dsl.pitt.edu (Gordon E. Banks) (01/14/90)

In article <1083@disk.UUCP> wells@disk.UUCP (Lee Wells) writes:
>I would like to know if there are any interested parties in forming
>a subgroup in sci.med to deal with preventive medicine.
>

That depends.  Would it be to discuss anti-smoking, drinking, and
drug-taking campaigns, what sorts of exercize are best, environment
and  occupational medicine, immunizations, weight control?  

Or would it simply be another forum for vitamin
quacks to discuss how many times the RDA of vitamin X or fubarium
are necessary to avoid an early demise?  If the latter, let's
start it now and call it alt.med.prevent and leave the sci out.

russ@wpg.com (Russell Lawrence) (01/15/90)

In article <1083@disk.UUCP> wells@disk.UUCP (Lee Wells) writes:
> I would like to know if there are any interested parties in forming
> a subgroup in sci.med to deal with preventive medicine.

In article <1990Jan13.164227.22781@cadre.dsl.pitt.edu>, Gordon E. Banks writes:
> That depends.  Would it be to discuss anti-smoking, drinking, and
> drug-taking campaigns, what sorts of exercize are best, environment
> and  occupational medicine, immunizations, weight control?  
> 
> Or would it simply be another forum for vitamin
> quacks to discuss how many times the RDA of vitamin X or fubarium
> are necessary to avoid an early demise?  If the latter, let's
> start it now and call it alt.med.prevent and leave the sci out.

As usual, Gordon, we agree on the goals, but not on the methods.  As
a person who's keenly aware of the widespread prevalence of quackery and 
the underlying ignorance of the scientific method, I would welcome such 
a group.  If it turns out to be a forum for unproven nonsense, perhaps 
you and I could accomplish some good by imparting healthy skepticism to 
some true believers/suckers who might otherwise fall victim to the
charlatans.

Contrary to the folk maxim, it's dialog that's golden.  By contrast,
silence really sucks.    
-- 
Russell Lawrence, WP Group, New Orleans (504) 443-5000
russ@wpg.com   uunet!wpg!russ

karl@ficc.uu.net (Karl Lehenbauer) (01/15/90)

In article <1083@disk.UUCP> wells@disk.UUCP (Lee Wells) writes:
>I realize there are a lot of opinions out there, but if Pink Floyd rates
>a group, I figure stopping the aging process might also.

Stop the aging process and we'll get you one.

Stop Pink Floyd's aging process, too.  They're getting on and it's embarrassing.
-- 
-- uunet!ficc!karl "...as long as there is a Legion of super-Heroes, 
		       all else can surely be made right."   -- Sensor Girl