richard@gryphon.UUCP (10/23/87)
In article <1071@puff.wisc.edu> mading@puff.wisc.edu (Eric Mading) writes: >> In article <1004@puff.wisc.edu> mading@puff.wisc.edu (that's me) writes: >> >I have seen the error of my ways, Only in the past, but not the present eh ? >If you want to use drugs, you can use them in the >privacy of your own home. No one will arrest you. This is niave, if not stupid. >I probably drink more than any >pro-legalization poster. This could explain things. >In fact, not all drug users are addicts. *In fact* VERY VERY few are. >I just wish that those that >use drugs would accept the fact that drugs will never be legalized. The main >force behind drug legalization is economic forces present during economically >troubled times. It took a deep depression for alcohol to be legalized. We had >a depression that was almost that bad fifty years from the time of the Great >Depression. I believe that today's deep plunge on the stock market will start >another depression, and those who think that drugs should be legalized might >just win out. You made this up, right ? Or did you get it from _War on Drugs_ magazine ? >I admit to going too far with this posting, I apoligize to those I offended, >and I promise that I will be more consciencious in future postings. You apologize in advance and go on with more misinformation and sheer bullshit ? How consciencious is that ? Grrrr. "Have a nice day" -- Richard J. Sexton INTERNET: richard@gryphon.CTS.COM UUCP: {hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, ihnp4, nosc}!crash!gryphon!richard "It's too dark to put the keys in my ignition..."