hdunne@amethyst.ma.arizona.edu (|-|ugh) (03/16/88)
In article <348@sono.UUCP> storga@sono.UUCP (Gordon Storga) writes: }In article <457@amethyst.UUCP> hdunne@amethyst.ma.arizona.edu (|-|ugh) writes: }>You seem to think that Big Brother/Uncle can treat anyone he likes as a common }>criminal, and if someone protests, it's prima facie evidence that he's guilty. }>Let me ask you a question, Mr. Storga: do you have curtains on your bedroom }>window? If so, why? What do you have to hide? } }My, what an intelligent response. There is a difference between }being fingerprinted and modesty. But you probably can't figure that }out through your drug damaged brain. [...] }I've heard that drug addiction can lead to }paranoid psychological disturbances.... \begin{flame} Dolts like you really make me laugh, Storga. Your IQ being less than your shoe size, you simply cannot grasp the concept of someone who objects to police state measures against drugs but is NOT A DRUG USER. So when you read a posting such as mine, the wheels turn slowly and creakily in your head, and out pops the conclusion, "Aha, he's a junkie". Then the wheels turn some more, producing a stream of verbiage that has nothing to do with my posting, while you remain blissfully ignorant that your premise is false. One of these days, good little citizen Storga will go in eagerly for his drug test, happy and grateful for this chance to show that he's clean, and WHAM - false positive. I wish I could be around when that happens. Well, that's enough of flaming. It's not nice to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed person, and anyway you're not worth the time. I'm forcing followups to alt.flame, which I don't read, so you can rant and rave to your little heart's content. \end{flame} Hugh Dunne | UUCP: ..{cmcl2,ihnp4,seismo!noao}!arizona!amethyst!hdunne Dept. of Math. | Phone: | ARPA: hdunne@amethyst.ma.arizona.edu Univ. of Arizona | +1 602 621 4766 | Bitnet: hdunne@arizrvax Tucson AZ 85721 | +1 602 621 6893 | Internet: hdunne@rvax.ccit.arizona.edu
matt@oddjob.UChicago.EDU (Schizophrenic Solipsist) (03/18/88)
In article <463@amethyst.UUCP> Hugh Dunne writes:
) Well, that's enough of flaming. It's not nice to engage in a battle of wits
) with an unarmed person, and anyway you're not worth the time. I'm forcing
) followups to alt.flame, which I don't read, so you can rant and rave to your
) little heart's content.
Sending followups to a group you don't read is a childish way to
pretend to get the last word. If you want to flame, do it in
alt.flame *only*. And if you do so without reading responses, you're
a spineless worm.
And besides - you failed miserably. You misspelled the header line,
thereby subjecting misc.legal readers to useless replies such as this
one.
No comment on the original question.
________________________________________________________
Matt University matt@oddjob.uchicago.edu
Crawford of Chicago {astrovax,ihnp4}!oddjob!matt