chod@gypsy.UUCP (10/30/86)
Well, Well ??? Don't leave me in suspense. Did the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 pass or not?
magore@watdcsu.UUCP (M.A.Gore - ICR) (10/30/86)
In article <30400004@gypsy.UUCP> chod@gypsy.UUCP writes: > >Well, Well ??? > >Don't leave me in suspense. Did the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of >1986 pass or not? Yes and signed with some last minute changes, the issue has been well covered on net.ham-radio (At least I hope 'thier' sources are good :-)... Follow up in that group for more info.... # Mike Gore # Institute for Computer Research. ( watmath!mgvax!root - at home ) # These ideas/concepts do not imply views held by the University of Waterloo.
alanj@orca.TEK.COM (Alan Jeddeloh) (10/31/86)
In article <30400004@gypsy.UUCP> chod@gypsy.UUCP writes: > >Well, Well ??? > >Don't leave me in suspense. Did the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of >1986 pass or not? If it's the law I think you mean, it did. I read about a law just passed dealing with electronic mail &c. in (of all places) _Stamp Collector_. I don't have it here at work, but I will check at home. -- -Alan Jeddeloh Tektronix GTD tektronix!orca!alanj
artm@phred.UUCP (Art Marriott) (11/03/86)
In article <2213@orca.TEK.COM> alanj@orca.UUCP (Alan Jeddeloh) writes: > >If it's the law I think you mean, it did. I read about a law just passed >dealing with electronic mail &c. in (of all places) _Stamp Collector_. I I'm glad to hear of the news being published SOMEWHERE! Does anyone recall another act of Congress with such potentially far-reaching effects on all of us being passed with so little publicity?? -------------------------------------------------Art Marriott tikal!phred!artm Apathy? who cares? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------