devine@vianet.UUCP (Bob Devine) (07/30/87)
Earlier this year someone (sorry, I forgot who) posted the results for factoring a large number. It was done using 10(12?) Sun 3s. Result was that an 80+ digit number was factor in several hundred hours of compute time. Idle curosity prompts me to ask: Have some Sun 4s been hooked to run the same factoring program?
bs@linus.UUCP (Robert D. Silverman) (08/03/87)
In article <210@vianet.UUCP] devine@vianet.UUCP (Bob Devine) writes:
] Earlier this year someone (sorry, I forgot who) posted the
]results for factoring a large number. It was done using 10(12?)
]Sun 3s. Result was that an 80+ digit number was factor in
]several hundred hours of compute time.
]
] Idle curosity prompts me to ask: Have some Sun 4s been hooked
]to run the same factoring program?
The current factoring record, held by me was that of an 87 digit primitive
cofactor of 5^128 + 1. I am currently working on a 88 digit primitive cofactor
of 10^94 + 1 and should finish it within the next couple of days.
SUN 4's won't give too much of a speed advantage over SUN 3's because the
algorithm depends mostly on the memory cycle time and not on processor speed.
Bob Silverman