[net.sf-lovers] The Prisoner

jagardner@watmath.UUCP (jagardner) (02/08/85)

[...]

People who are interested in the Prisoner may be interested in
"The Prisoner Puzzle", a booklet put together by TVOntario (Ontario's
equivalent of PBS) when they were showing the series five or six
years ago.  In those days, TVO had to go out of its way to prove
that entertaining shows like the Prisoner were also educational,
since TVO's mandate is to provide _educational_ TV that doesn't compete
with commercial television.  At any rate, they followed each show with
a discussion of the episode's major themes, pointed out nifty pieces
of symbolism the viewer might have missed, and so on.  It got a little
pompous, but it had good moments.

The booklet could be obtained at that time (and maybe now, for all I
know) by writing to TVOntario, Customer Relations Dept. in Toronto.
You should be able to get the address from a phone book -- most major
libraries in Canada carry U.S. phone books, so U.S. libraries may
have Toronto phone books.  (Maybe I'm being naive.)  Anyway, the booklet
contained a description and discussion of all 17 episodes, in the order
that they originally aired, plus an interview with Patrick McGoohan, and
other neat stuff.

By the way, I object to the statement made on the net that the Prisoner
is not SF.  The episode "A, B, or C", for example, contains "dream-monitoring"
equipment to see if Number 6 lets down his guard when he's asleep (three
guesses whether he does).  Much of the series IS more down-to-earth, of
course, but they didn't blink an eye at departures from reality.

While we're on the subject of the Prisoner, I should point out that
it is a direct continuation of a series that aired as "Danger Man"
in Britain, and as "Secret Agent" in the U.S.  (Remember the big
hit song, "Secret Agent Man", that was its theme?)  In the last
episode, the secret agent (played by McGoohan) resigns from the agency
because he disapproves of what they did to a fellow agent who may or
may not have defected.  The lead-in to the Prisoner is obvious.  I might
also point out that the secret agent was never called by his real name;
he had a cover identity that they used most of the time, but they made
it clear that it was only a cover.  As the theme song said, "They've
given you a number and taken 'way your name."

Also, there were a few Prisoner paperbacks published a number of
years ago, in much the same style as the Man from UNCLE paperbacks
people may remember.  I've read one, by David Gerrold, I believe
(the famous tribbler).  In it, Number 6 and a romantic interest
(a woman prisoner who may or may not be working for Village authorities)
stage a production of Shakespeare's "Measure for Measure" as a cover
for an escape attempt.  An odd little book, with the same sort of
elegant paranoia of the show.

				Jim Gardner
				University of Waterloo

john@hp-pcd.UUCP (john) (02/09/85)

<<<


   The only thing certain about episode #7 was that the pilot knew where
the village was. Since the pilot was the one who ejected #6 it is possible
that he was one of them. You cannot assume that the pilot found the village
by following #6's instructions which means that they may or may not be valid.

John Eaton
!hplabs!hp-pcd!john

iannucci@sjuvax.UUCP (iannucci) (02/12/85)

[ #6: Whose side are you on?   #2: That would be telling! ]

>I propose we move it to net.tv.   I do love it and want to get a rollicking
>discussion going about it.  Re: episode 7, I have seen it so what do
>you have to say?  And how do you *know* where the Village is?
>
>-Michael  "on the Twilight Node"  Weiss            ...!psuvax1!gondor!weiss

                   Sounds like a good idea to me, Mike, that is, to move it 
to net.tv.  From now on that is where I will look for discussion.  Point
well made re: How do I *know* where the Village is. I guess I don't *know*
where it is. I should know by now that nothing, repeat NOTHING, is ever as it
seems in this show. But I can tell you how I *think*  I know.

***** ALERT!! ALERT!!  SPOILER APPROACHING!!  *******

       In episode 7, did not No. 6 and his old colleagues trace the route he
had sailed and determine using various scientific methods that his point of
departure must have been the Baltic coast of Lithuania? And did he not fly in
the jet to that very spot when he was dropped like a hot potato? It seems to me
that this is pretty convincing evidence, but I do concede that there is always 
a 'bug' lying dormant in evidence like this. 

       By the way, do you (or anyone else) have any ideas about the 
'funny-umbrellas' or the old-fashioned bicycle. viz. significance? I hope
we're not going to dominate this discussion.

-- 
David J. Iannucci (the dirty vicar)                   St. Joseph's University
{allegra | astrovax | bpa | burdvax}!sjuvax!iannucci             Philadelphia

"A witty saying proves nothing. "                                  --Voltaire
=============================================================================

@RUTGERS.ARPA:milne@uci-icse (02/13/85)

From: Alastair Milne <milne@uci-icse>


   Marvellous series.  I hope it comes around this way again.
   But WITHOUT the psychiatrist who, the last time it was run, supplied 
   comments after every show.  Yes, I know it's hard to believe anything
   so ruinous, but that's what they did.  Hanging would have been far too
   good.  (BTW, this in the LA/Orange County area of California.)

   I never really thought that, beyond Number 1 and Number 2, there was 
   any real heirarchy in the numbering system.  For one thing, *nobody* 
   would have been at the same level as anybody else.  Odd heirarchy.  But how
   did he get to be Number 6, when there were people with numbers in the
   hundreds (and who were *they*?  Spies?  Warders?  Innocent people?)?  One
   wonders whether the Village had already been there, or whether it was 
   specially set up to try to break him.  Big project for one man, but then
   he was an important agent.  But if it had already been there for a time,
   surely that number would already have been taken.  Or did it happen to be 
   vacant at the time?  

   As to that umbrella thing that the Number 2's carry, it could (knowing 
   the Village) be just about anything (a personal escape rocket, perhaps?)
   but it *could* just be an umbrella.  As I recall, lots of the Villagers, 
   especially the women, wore rain capes from time to time.  If the Village
   is in Britain, they'd need them.

   I agree that the Village was *probably* run by British Intelligence,
   but it's almost as hard for us to tell as it is for Number 6.  That, of 
   course, is the fundamental conflict of the series: he doesn't know whether 
   the warders are British, or enemies trying to break him; they don't know 
   whether he's loyal to Britain, or selling out to enemies.  And we really 
   get no more clues than he does.  It keeps the suspense up constantly.

   Begging your pardon, I believe that quote is:
   "I am not a number, I am a free man!"  to which the only reply he gets 
   is Number 2's long, loud laughter, seeming to come from a moonlit, grey
   sky.

   Excellent series, one of the finest I've ever seen.  I do hope it comes
   back.

				Alastair Milne

   "Je ne suis pas une numero!  Je suis un homme LIBRE!"
      -- from the French translation shown on channel 79 in Toronto.

@RUTGERS.ARPA:Boebert.NSP@HI-MULTICS.ARPA (02/15/85)

From: Boebert@HI-MULTICS.ARPA

No discussion of the Prisoner should omit the games for the Apple; the
first one was about the cleverest use of low-res graphics ever.  For
those who have not been exposed to them, the games capture the spirit of
the show in excellent fashion.  They were produced by a company called
Edu-Ware, which I believe is now defunct.  As with most Apple games,
pirated copies abound, alas; these were two games which were worth the
money.