sp0618@cec1.wustl.edu (Saeed Pirooz) (02/14/90)
I strongly support the formation of this group. There are plenty of topics that could be discussed, cultural, political, and philosophical. Saeed Pirooz
farhad@Tehran.Stanford.EDU (Farhad Shakeri) (02/14/90)
Yes, why not, one more time.
I support the formation of soc.culture.iranian.
+----------------------------------------------------+
/ Farhad Shakeri E-Mail: /
/ Stanford University farhad@Tehran.Stanford.EDU /
/ Computer Science Dept. /
+----------------------------------------------------+troly@redwood.math.ucla.edu (Bret Jolly) (02/22/90)
The charter to this proposed group should direct purely political
discussions to talk.politics.mideast. This is what currently limits
the flamage in soc.culture.arabic.
? "In your heart, you know it's flat."
Bret Jolly (Bo'-ret Tro Ly) Mathemagus LA Platygaean Society
.monnie@rruxh.UUCP (Nariman Shambayati) (02/23/90)
troly@redwood.math.ucla.edu (Bret Jolly) writes: >The charter to this proposed group should direct purely political >discussions to talk.politics.mideast. This is what currently limits >the flamage in soc.culture.arabic. I disagree. The volume in talk.politics.mideast is too much to handle. Besides, many aspects of Iranian politics is not related directly to the middle east. I strongly feel that soc.culture.iranian should include politics of Iran in its charter. Politics is as much a part of our life and culture as the other facets suggested in the call for vote from Mr. Hematt. -- ....bellcore!rruxh!monnie or rruxh!monnie@thumper.bellcore.com