[soc.culture.indian] Castes and religion in India

badri@ur-valhalla.UUCP (Badri Lokanathan) (10/09/86)

In article <1245@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU> martillo@trillian.UUCP (Yakim Martillo) writes:
>In article <2536@ihlpg.UUCP> nkg1@ihlpg.UUCP writes:
>>To: ihnp4!cbatt!clyde!caip!elbereth!rutgers!husc6!panda!genrad!mit-eddie!mit-trillian!martillo
>>Subject: Re: An Independent Sikh State
>>In-reply-to: your article <1232@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU>
> 
A minor point, first of all. It seems to me that this message was
intended to be personal mail to Yakim from nkg1@ihlpg, which accidentally
made it to the net. Now to what I have to say:
>
>I have also read this as well and I am not sure if I believe it.  If
>there is a knowledgeable Sikh on the net, I would be interested in
>comments.  I was under the impression Sikh religion rejected a lot of
>specifically Hindu practices like caste.  Further I am under the
>impression Sikh religion owes a lot to Islam and is basically
>monotheist.  I do not understand what would be the caste status of the
>children of a Hindu/Sikh marriage.  The only Sikh/Hindu marriages I
>know of are between people who are totally removed from traditional
>Hindu or Sikh culture. 
>

Disclaimer: I am not a Sikh and therefore what I say here is
entirely on the basis of what I have heard from friends belonging
to the community referred to or read about in India.

(A) Regarding the issue of Hindu-Sikh conversion/marriages, I believe the
Arya Samaj community (a reformist hindu sect founded by Dayanand Saraswati) 
have traditionally had instances of conversion and marriage. An Arya Samaji
class mate of mine told me that an uncle of his was a converted Sikh,
because his grandmother had taken a vow in a gurudwara (the Sikh place of
worship) that she would convert a child to Sikhism if she had a son.
He also told me that this is fairly common practice in his community.
My cousin's wife, who is a Punjabi hindu, regularly goes to a
neighbouring gurudwara, carrying on a practice common in her family.

(B) Regarding the issue of caste, one must always keep in mind that
although hinduism was the basis for it, it evolved as a complex
socio-economic system, often transcending religious boundaries. 

Evidence:
(1) I know a family who claim to be Brahmin Christians (i.e. their
    ancestors were originally hindu brahmins.)
(2) I know of several Sikhs who originally came from backward
    communities and get social benefits from the govt. because they
    belong to scheduled castes. E.g. Mr. Buta Singh, who has held
    several ministerial posts with the Indian govt. claims to be
    a member of a backward sikh community (whatever that means -)
    Another Sikh dorm mate of mine got priority admission to the
    school because he was a "scheduled caste sikh".
    A Sikh dorm mate of mine (also a classmate and very good friend of
    mine) claimed rajput (high class warrior) descent and was proud of it. 
(3) In the South Indian state of Tamil Nadu, there was a spate of
    conversion from lower caste to the Islamic faith. Newspapers
    reported that they were still treated as pariahs, not just by the
    hindu community but by other muslims as well.

On paper, each religion that I have mentioned - Christianity, Sikhism
and Islam rejects the caste system. Yet it remains as part of the
Indian social structure, irrespective of religion. Ironically the
government, in its efforts to support members of backward communities,
perpetuates the system.

In a way there is justification for it; after all, if backward classes
are to be supported by additional incentives, then it should apply
even to converts - why shouldn't they benefit from a system meant to
help all those who suffered under the caste system. The problem is
that wherever there is economic benefit, there is bound to be misuse
and hence social backlash (as seen in the Gujarat riots.)

Coming to the evolution of Sikhism, it did not evolve directly from
Islam, but from Sufiism (a reformist islamic sect around the 15th
century.) Sufiism claimed to be a hybrid between Islam and hinduism.
Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism was initially a sufi, but his
teachings are now what is known as the Sikh religion. The sikhs were
persecuted by the muslims for their beliefs - several of the Sikh
gurus were put to death by the muslim rulers of that time. This is why
Sikhism evolved into a highly militant religion from the pacifism of
Guru Nanak.

The point of this historic diversion is that though Sikhism can claim
anscestoral descent from Islam, it was heavily influenced by hindu
culture as well. There is sufficient evidence for this; however I will
leave the discussion here for someone more knowledgeable.

Badri Lokanathan
-- 
"We will fight for the right to be free | ARPA: ur-valhalla!badri@rochester.arpa
 We will build our own society          | UUCP: {cmcl2,columbia,cornell,harvard,
 We will - we will sing                 |        ll-xn,nike,seismo,topaz}
 We will sing our own song."      -UB40 |       !rochester!ur-valhalla!badri