dave@ccicpg.UUCP (12/01/87)
In article <26268COK@PSUVMA>, COK@PSUVMA.BITNET (R. W. Clark to the masses) writes: > Funny. Just got some email from you, Dave. Real Mading stuff, that. Yes after many tries I did find the right combination. Fortunately I've forgotten which one it was. R.W., name calling does not a flame make. It just confirms the opinion of you your postings and mail led me to form. Do us ALL a favor will you? Re-read IN THE ORDER THAT IT OCCURED all of the writings leading up to your temper tantrum. I think you'll find that you're mistaken on a few points. Most points. All the points. Yes I DID flame you after you threw some cheap shots around DAYS before HRH returned and yes I did throw in one more the NEXT day or so because Your postings bore me Your mail wastes my time Your flames aren't And your style is pathetic Dave -- CDP 7 46872 DDD {UUNET, cci632}!ccicpg!leo!dave
HPX@PSUVMA.BITNET (The Mad Arab) (12/02/87)
dave@ccicpg.UUCP ( Dave Hill) writes: >fuck off and die psu toady >Subject: Morons posting from a different reality >R.W., name calling does not a flame make. It just confirms the opinion >of you your postings and mail led me to form. No comment. >Your flames aren't That was not a flame. That was a bitch. The only flame I've ever made is Re: Imported Woman's Fox Fur Coats. So I won't even argue with you, except to say that it wasn't intended as a flame. Your arguments weren't worth flaming, so I didn't. ------- cok%psuvma@psuvax1.psu.edu ". . .I'm all for law and order. I only cok%psuvma@psuvax1.uucp wish they worked better." Gahan Wilson cok%psuvma.bitnet@psuvax1.uucp [and various and sundry other The Mad Arab posting from HPX foul things]