richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton) (10/28/89)
From sci.bio. In article <2669@basser.oz> pete@basser.oz (Peter Merel) writes: >In article <1947@moondance.cs.uq.oz> ant@batserver.cs.uq.oz writes: >>pete@basser.oz (Peter Merel) writes: >>Unfortunately I am not prepared to spend the time that you have looking for >>articles to the contrary. I think however I could find an equally convincing >>array of articles denying the existance of the G-Spot. It is the same with >>anything that is not completely understood in science I suppose. > >Read 'em again, ant. Those articles DO deny the existance of a G-spot. If you >mean articles denying vaginal erotic sensitivity - I couldn't find any. I >still haven't looked up Hoch & Alzate in the SCI, but will do sometime in >the next week. > >For CC: the fluid I observed was clear, more viscous than I would expect >urine to be, and without any of the attendant odour of urine. The females in >question were healthy specimens as far as they or I know. >-- >"A dog don't want a bone / That's why he buries it" >- James Brown pete@basser.oz.AU I propose the newsfroup sci.cu..... Never mind. I'm in enough trouble as it is. -- ``Mathematics is a fiction created by man to rationalize the universe. It is not a science'' - Thomas Silverton, 1799. richard@gryphon.COM decwrl!gryphon!richard gryphon!richard@elroy.jpl.NASA.GOV