[talk.origins] Religion vs Science

cbo@utai.UUCP (Calvin Bruce Ostrum) (09/14/86)

Mike Huybensz (cybvax0!mrh) writes:
| In favor of the Christian god we have claims that are either unprovable or
| essentially identical to those of many other religions, which have also
| been "verified by millions".
| 
| In favor of science, we have claims that have enabled agricultural, medical,
| military, communication, transportation, and luxury revolutions unprecedented
| in the history of the world.  The choice is simple.

Two points: Don't give so much credit to man and his science that you forget
that reality has to meet him half way. Reality deserves some credit for
being such a way, objectively and indepdendently of man, so as to enable
man's science to work. Isn't it just a little bit of a mystery as to
how reality manages to be that way?

Also, to use Mike's term, isn't it a little bit of a ``logical flaw'' to
be comparing apples and oranges? I don't think many religions claim to
be able to produce the results produced by technology. Should that 
bother them?

An intriguing excerpt from Paul Feyerabend (who is a very articulate and
able philosopher of science): "[Science's] results will appear magnificent
to some traditions, execrable to others, barely worth a yawn to still
further traditions. Of course, our well conditioned materialistic
contemporaries are liable to burst with excitement over events such as
the moonshots, the double helix, non-equilibrium thermodynamics. But let
us look at the matter from a different point of view, and it becomes
a ridiculous exercise in futility. It needed billions of dollars,
thousands of well trained assistants, years of hard work to enable some
inarticulate and rather limited comtemporaries to perform a few graceless
hops in a place nobody in his right might would think of visiting --
a dried out, airless, hot stone. But mystics, using only their minds
travelled across the celestial spheres to God himself whom them viewed
in all his splendour receiving strength for continuing their lives and
enlightenment for themselves and their fellow men. It is only the illiteracy
of the general public and of their stern trainers, the intellectuals,
and their amazing lack of imagination that makes them reject such comparisons
without further ado."


Calvin Bruce Ostrum, University of Toronto Department of Computer Science
uucp: 	{ihnp4 decwrl utzoo uw-beaver decvax allegra linus}!utcsri!utai!cbo
arpa:	cbo%toronto@csnet-relay
csnet:	cbo@toronto