[talk.philosophy.misc] Emotion, Logic, and Value Systems

kort@hounx.UUCP (B.KORT) (09/11/86)

I have enjoyed the lively discussion on the role of emotion
in the construction of logical lines of reasoning, and I was
delighted to see Michael Ellis inject the issue of Value
Systems.

I would now like to advance a provocative conjecture.

It is my conjecture that Value Systems are like Mathematical
Systems, in that we strive for completeness and internal
consistency in the construction of personal Value Systems.
Perhaps it can be shown that Value Systems are instances
of Kripke Structures.

Now I have to admit that my own Value System is enormously
influenced by the Judeo-Christian Ethic, with a liberal
overlay of Scientific Method, Taoism, and Zen Buddhism.
I am influenced by Socrates, Hillel, Jesus, Maimonides,
Lao Tse, Mendelsohn, Spinoza, Newton, Einstein, Hofstadter,
Bronowski, Sagan, Smullyan, Asimov, and Kripke, to name just
a few.  Their memes seem to get a long just fine inside my
"careenium".  I have the illusion that my Value System
is internally consistent and derivable from first principles
(just like Newton, Russel, or Whitehead suggested).  Yet
I know from Mr. Goedel that I really have an incomplete
value system, and that it can grow forever, sprouting
new branches at the perimeter, wherever I detect myself
on the horns of yet another moral dilemma.  It seems that
the discovery of paradox, followed by new insight, followed
by the growth of a new branch of the tree of knowledge is
a pattern from which there is no escape (thank God).

So dear netters.  I leave you with a question.  Are Value
Systems derivable, at least to a first approximation?  If
so, what role do Aristotelian Logic, Combinatorial Logic,
and Intuitionist Logic play in knitting the fabric of Wisdom?
Do we knit one stitch and then come up with a perl or two?
Or are they all nits, to be picked, plucked, and pruned?

Better yet, if I could construct a perfect reasoning machine,
and set it to the task of deriving a carefully balanced system
of ethics, morals, laws, etc., would it derive a structure
resembling that of, say, Mortimer Adler, or would it come up
with Khomeni's system of distinguished authority?

Barry Kort
hounx!kort