[talk.politics.misc] let bureaucrats suck

berman@psuvax1.UUCP (Piotr Berman) (09/15/86)

> >>>The consumers have to learn how to make
> >>>intelligent choices, that is one of the
> >>>virtues of a voucher system.  [Tedrick]
> 
> >I think it isn't a matter of stupidity, but of access. Poor par-
> >ents, with no car or maybe just no time (or gas money) to fight traf-
> >fic N hours a day, will not send their children to school 30 miles
> >away from home, [Oded]
> 
> So, give the poor enough "educational voucher money" so that decent
> schools will be set up for them nearby. I would support sinking a lot
> *MORE* public money into education. Only, I don't want the bureaucrats
> to get their hands on it.
> ........ 
> If students have enough voucher money the schools would make good
> lunches available for the students, else the students could go to
> another school also competing for their voucher money.
> 
> I would also suggest making more "food stamp money" available to the
> poor. The Romans had it right, give the people bread and circuses
> if you want to maintain the social order. The Reaganites haven't
> seemed to understand the need for bread. TV has done a good job
> providing circuses. What I would add to the mix is education, once
> the bread and circuses are taken care of.
> 
The proposals I heard about were talking about $600 per year voucher.
The average public school spends more than 3 or 4 times than that.
For a preschool (rather good, I hope) I pay around $1900 per year.
You are talking about vouchers of at least $2000 per year.  I would
agree, provided:
a. the funding is federal;
b. the establishment clause is obeyed (I would be flexible: e.g.
   a catholic school accepting vouchers could not require children
   to be catholic, should have no discount for catholics, and should
   not teach/preach during the time were all chldren are required to
   be present, they could do it during extra time, however);
c. the minimal requirements on programs are obeyed (with evolution
   and sex education).
d. discrimination prohibition should be enforced.

By now, however, we talk about a program which is pretty liberal
(or, to an objective person, just pretty).

Piotr Berman