[talk.politics.misc] Iceland summit

alang@shark.UUCP (10/13/86)

So much for the concept of SDI being a bargaining chip.  And to think I
actually fell for this idea at one time.

I can't believe those two men were so close to eliminating all strategic
nuclear warheads, and couldn't compromise on the one issue that stood in
their way.  Has anyone heard what compromises were proposed, and by who?



Alan Geist
tektronix!shark!alang

tedrick@ernie.Berkeley.EDU (Tom Tedrick) (10/14/86)

After seeing all kinds of BS about the recent Iceland summit,
I thought you should know the truth :-)

The Soviet strategy was very simple: either weaken SDI or 
create/accentuate divisions in the west (which may indirectly
weaken SDI anyway).

(See "Strategy", by Liddell-Hart, for more discussion of this
 method of dual objectives, where the adversary is put on the
 "horns of a dilemma" by being unable to defend against both
 objects of the enemy plan.)

So they presented Reagan with two bad alternatives: if he
decides to keep SDI the Soviets give his internal political
opposition (ie Democrats, liberals, etc.) ammunition to
attack and weaken the Republicans for the November elections,
accentuate the split between liberals and conservatives
in Europe, weaken the NATO alliance, etc.

The absolute cynicism of the Soviet leadership in using the
meeting solely for political/propaganda purposes has a downside for
them that I hope they will consider: by destroying the small
amount of credibility they have remaining they may create an
irrevocable feeling on the right that the time has come for
abandoning efforts to negotiate with the Soviets and preparing
in earnest for a real war, say 10 years down the road, when
there will be a chance that the west will have a decisive
advantage, through exploitation of new weapons technology
and tactics.

When are the Soviets going to cease their efforts to take
advantage of every situation and learn to cooperate for
the benefit of both sides? The USA/USSR could establish
a world order ensuring peace, security and stability for
all. Instead the Soviets are shortsightedly pursuing
policies of destabilization of the rest of the world.
It is time they started acting like a responsible and
powerful nation instead of a bunch of wild-eyed revolutionaries
bent on overthrowing the world order. The USSR itself is now
a fundamental part of the establishment and has much to lose
by creating chaos in the world.