[net.music] How could anyone be so blatantly inconsistent?

daemon@decwrl.UUCP (The devil himself) (11/02/85)

>I dunno why people continue with these reviews like "I heard a Kate Bush
>song once and didn't think it was all that great".  They are pretty
>pointless.  
>				Doug Alan

The answer lies within.   For not two days ago you yourself posted exactly
this kind of thing about the new Steve Morse album!  Don't you remember?

Sheesh!

	"That boy ain't right"

		Dave Blickstein

(UUCP)  {allegra|decvax|ihnp4|ucbvax}!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-tle!blickstein

(ARPA)  BLICKSTEIN%TLE.DEC@DECWRL.ARPA

nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (Doug Alan) (11/03/85)

>> I dunno why people continue with these reviews like "I heard a Kate
>> Bush song once and didn't think it was all that great".  They are
>> pretty pointless.
>				Doug Alan

> The answer lies within.   For not two days ago you yourself posted exactly
> this kind of thing about the new Steve Morse album!  Don't you remember?

> Sheesh!

> Dave Blickstein

Sheesh!

That was the point!  Maybe *that*'s why I was so blatantly inconsistent?
It was a totally rediculous review.  I was trying to say, gee anyone can
listen to one small piece of an artist's output for three minutes and
make stupid comments about it being derivative or "nothing special" or
boring or whatever.

I guess people just don't appreciate satire anymore.  Maybe I was being
too subtle, but I thought it was quite "blatant".  I'll try to be less
subtle next time, but I don't know if it will work -- a whole bunch of
people thought my article entitled "Volume" several months back was
serious, and I can't imagine being any less subtle than that.

			"Running over the same old ground
			 And how we found the same old fears"

			 Doug Alan
			  nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (or ARPA)