Love-Hounds-request@EDDIE.MIT.EDU.UUCP (12/20/86)
Really-From: Nancy Everson <everson@spca.bbn.com> Here's the latest message from my reluctant friend. He enjoys reading the responses everyone has been sending. Maybe I can talk him into joining the list, and he can respond directly. - nancy nancy everson (everson@spca.bbn.com) bbn software products corporation, cambridge mass ----- Forwarded message # 1: Date: Fri, 19 Dec 86 15:38:42 EST From: Kevin C To: everson@spca.bbn.com Subject: Responses re Kate Dear Kate, I heard from a few of your fans. It is amazing how extreme a fan or two can get, especially those who don't seem to know anything about creativity first-hand. They make me recall Nietzsche, who said something to the effect: "There are always members of a party who are so extreme that they make others lose faith in the cause..." (Friedrich said it better than I'm remembering). Anyway, you've got quite an enthusiastic fan club, Katey dear. The first one I heard from was IUD, who referred to himself only in the third person, and whose response was somewhat off the wall -- I wanted to know why I should fall in love with you, my sweet siren, and he simply provided a paean of his own adoration. I suppose: "Those who can't, preach". I also heard from a person named |>oug, who is also ardently vying with me for your affection. I think he actually understands his own response to you a bit, and that's nice. He was supportive to my cause (fool that I was to wear my heart out on my sleeve, and that for a songstress whose voice I didn't even quite like yet!) This lad quoted Harlan Ellison wittily in your defense, for reasons that were extraordinarily obscure to me until I remembered that "LoveHounds" is a mailing list about you, not Harlan. Actually, the Ellison quote re love-hounds put me in mind of a repartee from the Firesign Theatre: Nick: Some fancy layout you have here, Nancy -- What's this, your boudoir? Nancy: Oh no, these are the kennels... Nick: Puttin' on the dog, eh? ... Finally, a M. LeFebvre responded to my querulous love-letter to you by noting his own experience of encountering you -- and he had named my own experience precisely! I too first "got into you" with "The Man with the Child in His Eyes" and "Wuthering Heights", and it is precisely the abrupt movements into your "little-girl voice" that troubled me (the less so now, my dear woman-child). I suspect there still must be some hidden agenda, however. Why, after all, did M. LeFebvre decide it was reasonable to finally sit down and try to listen to you anyway? That's my big question -- what motivates one into the groove, if one starts off from more or less mainstream (e.g., even the Style Council or Fine Young Cannibals, never mind Pat Benatar and Madonna...)? What gives one that push? Is it ultimately "peer pressure" -- i.e., seeing that the people we like like you? Or is it those wonderful eyes, Katey darling? --Kevin ----- End of forwarded messages
Love-Hounds-request@EDDIE.MIT.EDU.UUCP (12/20/86)
Really-From: rosen%ji.Berkeley.EDU@BERKELEY.EDU (Rob Rosen) In article <8612192315.AA26404@EDDIE.MIT.EDU> you write: >Really-From: Nancy Everson <everson@spca.bbn.com> > >The first one I heard from was IUD, who referred to himself only in the third >person, and whose response was somewhat off the wall -- I wanted to know why I WOW!! A talking birth control device! Where can I get one of those? Geez, no wonder his response was so off the wall. He probably has a very limited point of view -- something resembling tunnel vision, I guess. What the miracles of modern science bring... %%Rob -- Rob Rosen Computer Systems {Research, Support} Group University of California rosen@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU (the syntactically correct address) ucbvax!rosen (for people who actually LIKE source routing)