[mod.music.gaffa] Another Kate-echism gone unheeded -- heathens!

Love-Hounds-request@EDDIE.MIT.EDU (01/23/87)

Really-From: IED0DXM%UCLAMVS.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU

>  A partial list:
>
>  Peter Gabriel:   Ouevre
>  Talking Heads:   Fear of Music, Remain in Light, Speaking in Tongues
>  King Crimson:    Discipline
>  Pink Floyd:      The Wall, The Dark Side of the Moon, Wish You Were Here
>  Alan Parsons:    Tales of Mystery and Imagination, Pyramid
>  Shriekback:      Big Night Music
>  Joy Division:    Closer (Fact XXV)
>  Various Artists: Lost in the Stars:  the music of Kurt Weill
>  Neil Young:      Rust Never Sleeps
>  Pete Townshend:  All the Best Cowboys Have Chinese Eyes, White City
>  The Who:         Who's Next (you said early 70s)
>  XTC:             Black Sea, The Big Express
>  Boomtown Rats:   The Fine Art of Surfacing
>
>-- Steve "Blore" Howard

How can you name a couple dozen!
IED couldn't name twenty-four LPs made
since, say, 1973, that are even
classifiable as "very good", even
without introducing comparative
values. Hell, there haven't more
than twenty-four classic rock
(or rock-associated) LPs made period --
and five of those spots are already filled by Kate!

Most of the records you've listed above are barely worth their
weight in vinyl. Three or four are
actually good: "Closer" is very strong, and one or two ("Remain in Light"
-- thanks entirely to Eno; and "Dark Side of the Moon") are candidates for
runner-up below Kate's most frivolous work to date.

But "Speaking in Tongues"!?
Peter Gabriel's entire oeuvre! Including this schlocky new one "So"!?
Boomtown Rats!!??
"Who's Next"!!!???

IED shudders to think.

>Though I agree with the above, there are two records that I think should be
>mentioned as fitting the above mold better than any others, if one was to not
>consider Kate's obviously superior work:  EMERSON LAKE & PALMER's WORKS Volume
>1 and GENESIS' THE LAMB LIES DOWN ON BROADWAY.  Keith Emerson's Piano Concerto
>No. 1 on ELP's WORKS Volume 1 will always be one of my favorites, no matter
>how overwhelmed I become with Kate's music.
>
>Mark Kat(e)souros

Well, though IED hates to disagree with Mark, who
usually turns a sympathetic ear to IED's ravings
about KT, he is inclined to agree with Bill's
assessment of Emerson's concerto. Any kind of familiarity
with the real thing will show up the awkwardness
and structural poverty of the Emerson piece.

As for "Lamb Lies Down", doesn't that still count as
early seventies stuff? Anyway, in spirit it sure does.

Thanks to Scott C. back at him, for the compliment and
the record-by-record analysis of the boxed set. The
general facts have been published in Homeground and
the like, but not in so clear and well organized a way,
and it is most welcome here. Pretty clearly Scott is
either a Kate Bush fan in earnest or an unusually
obsessive type (not that the two don't often go hand in hand).
Whatever the case, here's hoping we hear more from him in
future.

>Okay, now that we've found the secret message in X4... what does it
cmean?
>
>             puo<|

Well, it's more or less related to the theme, isn't it?
As for the specific meaning, that's what's so great --
it's TOO specific to described!


   dei --