taylor@hplabsc.UUCP (06/28/86)
le actions have led to many lawsuits against A.H.Robbins Co. for selling a dangerous product -- in full knowledge of its danger. Robbins is not in bankruptcy because someone made a design mistake; they are in because someone tried to cover up the danger in order to enhance profits. Much of the damage could have been averted by removing the product from the market and recalling the defective device. Tanner Andrews, Systems CompuData South, DeLand [Wow! Not such a good example after all, I guess. Indeed, if the company was guilty of criminal negligence, as appears to be the case, then they should certainly be held responsible. The problem arises when we expect 'institutions' to be perfect, I think. They all-too-easily fall into the trap of agreeing, and then, instead of occasionally admitting fault, hide it and act innocent. The example that comes to mind is medical malpractice - we expect our medical people to be absolutely perfect, and when they make mistakes (e.g. the wrong drug prescribed) society shuns them. Other medical people see this reaction and are even more pressured into hiding their mistakes... A tough circle to break out of. -- Dave]
taylor@hplabsc.UUCP (Dave Taylor) (07/01/86)
-------- This article is from ihnp4!opus!ki4pv!tanner@hplabs.HP.COM and was received on Wed Jun 25 17:59:47 1986 -------- You are in error in yr description of the A.H.Robbins action with the Dalkon Shield. They did indeed, without criminal intent, devise such a device. They then (again without criminal intent or negligence -- their best knowledge was that it was safe) placed it on the market. It was then discovered that the device sometimes had unexpected side-effects, e.g. sterilization, horrible infections, death, &c. They were made aware of these side-effects. Rather than withdraw the device from the market, or even warn the customers of the possible side-effects, they kept the information as secret as they could. They did not recall their dangerous product. It was not even withdrawn from the market for some time. This was the criminal intent. Such irresponsible actions have led to many lawsuits against A.H.Robbins Co. for selling a dangerous product -- in full knowledge of its danger. Robbins is not in bankruptcy because someone made a design mistake; they are in because someone tried to cover up the danger in order to enhance profits. Much of the damage could have been averted by removing the product from the market and recalling the defective device. Tanner Andrews, Systems CompuData South, DeLand [Wow! Not such a good example after all, I guess. Indeed, if the company was guilty of criminal negligence, as appears to be the case, then they should certainly be held responsible. The problem arises when we expect 'institutions' to be perfect, I think. They all-too-easily fall into the trap of agreeing, and then, instead of occasionally admitting fault, hide it and act innocent. The example that comes to mind is medical malpractice - we expect our medical people to be absolutely perfect, and when they make mistakes (e.g. the wrong drug prescribed) society shuns them. Other medical people see this reaction and are even more pressured into hiding their mistakes... A tough circle to break out of. -- Dave]