taylor@hplabsc.UUCP (02/08/87)
-- THE ETHICS OF COMPUTER CONFERENCING By John R. Cook ABSTRACT The objectives of the present study were twofold. First, an attempt was made to assess the extent to which some traditional moral principles governing face-to-face communication have gained acceptance by the users of computer conferences. This was done by assessing the prevailing community standards for computer conferencing on Compuserve's CB and on BITNET's Relay. The assessment was carried out using email and other message facilities on both of these networks to distribute a 24-item questionnaire entitled Questionnaire for Users of "CB's" and Other Computer "Chats". The second objective of the study was to explore some approaches that might be taken towards distributing questionnaires and collecting data over computer networks. The 25 CB and 112 Relay users participating in the study tended to be male, undergraduate students in their mid-twenties and their average level of education was that of a college sophomore. Six of the CB users also turned out to be Relay users. In terms of their use of electronic journal and mail services, the largest portion of Relay users (21%) were Psychnet subscribers, followed by NetNorth (17%) and COMSERVE (16%). CB users were found to be much more reluctant to participate in the study than Relay users, as evidenced by their lower response rate. Also, Relay users were found to be more accepting of a proposed rule requiring users to register their true names and identities before signing onto the system. Otherwise, there was a high degree of similarity in the responses of CB and Relay users on this survey. The moral or ethical standards for computer conferencing revealed by the survey were found to be largely consistent with the moral principles governing face-to-face communication. One difference between computer-mediated and face-to-face communication was suggested by the conference users' greater acceptance of practices such as adopting nicknames that are considered sexually provocative or sharing details of one's intimate personal relationships on a public channel. However, when CB and Relay users were asked to evaluate the potential benefits of computer conferencing, they appeared to discount the importance of some of these practices, in a way that brought them back in line with traditional moral principles governing face-to- face communication. In conclusion, it seems we do tend to attach importance to the same sorts of activities both on- and off-line. In this respect, several traditional moral principles governing face-to- face communication have been found to be accepted by the users of computer conferences. One area where discrepancies between our on-and off-line ethical standards do tend to occur, is in the larger range of behaviors we are willing to consider as morally acceptable in other conference users. This is an abstract of the full paper, which is still in preparation. For a copy of the full paper you may send your electronic mail address to John R. Cook, UD118169@NDSUVM1.Bitnet, and a copy paper will be sent to you when available.