[net.sources.d] net.sources.d what?

pedz@megamax (03/15/86)

Why is this called net.sources.d and not net.sources.doc.  Likewise,
what about bugs, etc.

tainter@ihlpg.UUCP (Tainter) (03/19/86)

> Why is this called net.sources.d and not net.sources.doc.  Likewise,
> what about bugs, etc.
The .d stands for discussion not documentation.

lvs@ndm20 (03/19/86)

>Why is this called net.sources.d and not net.sources.doc.  Likewise,
>what about bugs, etc.

If you had read the original posting about the split of net.sources, you
would have realized the 'd' stands for DISCUSSION, not documentation.
So, bugs fit in nicely here as well.

Larry V. Streepy Jr.                        "Waiting is"
Nathan D. Maier Consulting Engineers

VOICE:  (214)739-4741
Usenet: ...!{allegra|ihnp4}!convex!smu!ndm20!lvs
CSNET:  ndm20!lvs@smu
ARPA:   ndm20!lvs%smu@csnet-relay.ARPA

bart@reed.UUCP (Bart Massey) (03/22/86)

> Why is this called net.sources.d and not net.sources.doc?  Likewise,
> what about bugs, etc?

net.sources.discussion.  There is no net.sources.doc -- presumably the
docs are posted with the sources.  There is a net.sources.bugs.

				Bart Massey
				..tektronix!reed!bart