nonh@utzoo.UUCP (Chris Robertson) (07/08/86)
In article <3882@ukma.UUCP> david@ukma.UUCP (David Herron, NPR Lover) writes: >Why do you want the csh there? I can think of two reasons only: > >1) Aliases -- but the SysVr2 shell's shell procedures are MUCH MUCH > better. Granted. >2) History -- But there was some patches posted by somebody at GaTech > about a year ago (Was it Arnold Robbins??? Patches to source are totally useless for folks with binary licenses. Please, people, remember that there are *lots* of binary-only systems out there! -- Christine Robertson {linus, decvax, ihnp4}!utzoo!{nonh, toram!chris} Moral of the day, picked especially for Richard Fox: It is better to post nothing and seem like a fool, than set fingers to keyboard and remove all doubts.