wrd@tekigm2.UUCP (Bill Dippert) (05/16/86)
Does anyone have access to a copy of the electrical schematics to the 800XL and who can tell me the function of resistor R32? There is a conflict between several of the various 256K upgrades as to whether you add a wire to this resistor or you add a wire after removing the resistor. I have now installed the Newell 256K upgrade in my 800XLE (my nomenclature) and in doing so, I removed the resistor per Newell. However, the instructions for the similar RAMBO XL kit showed leaving this resistor and merely adding a wire to it. Does anyone know why? I have noticed that on some menus that I have the solid background has verical strips of different shades showing, but this may be due to some- thing else entirely. If this resisitor has nothing to do with picture quality, then I will leave it off as I don't see any evidence that it does anything else. Surely there are a group of persons out there who have converted 800XL's to 800XLE's? Can we get a discussion going on how you did the conversion and how well it went? My total time was about 1 1/2 hours, the most time spent was modifying the plastic housing to allow the wires to go thru the mounting hole and down underneath the board. Of course, I cheated and used color coded wires so I did not have to keep tracing down wires with an ohmmeter when wiring the leads to the PIA chip socket. I also had some good suggestions ahead of time from David Young. --Bill-- ========================================================================== Tektronix does not care that I like Atari's and I have no commercial in- terest in CDY or any other Atari shop or whatever. Just a hardwarehacker. ==========================================================================
jhs@disunix.UUCP (05/19/86)
The 3K resistor R32 is just a "pullup" resistor which puts a logic "1" on the unused pin 1 of the 64K RAM chip. If a 256K RAM is substituted as in the Newell or similar upgrades, this pin becomes the 17th and 18th bits of the address, since it, like the other 8 address lines, is multiplexed to get two address bits per wire. (The Phase 2 clock line is used to switch back and forth between the two sets of 8 bits, or 9 bits if you have upgraded.) Note that address bits are numbered 0 through 15 for the stock 800XL and so presumably 0 through 17 for the 18 bits needed in the upgrade. If you plugged in 256K RAMs and left the bit unchanged, it would make Bits 16 and 17 (the 17th and 18th bits) constantly "1", thus utilizing a particular block of 64K bits in the RAM and leaving the others out of use. If you hook a TTL logic gate to the IC (not 5V) end or R32 then that gate takes control of the logic level and does whatever it feels like, hopefully putting the other 3 64K blocks to good use. If the TTL circuit driving the extra address input has its own internal pullup resistor, then it would be best to remove the 3K resistor. If the gate has no internal pullup, then it should be connected to the resistor and the resistor left in place. That MAY explain the different approaches by different upgrade designs. On the other hand, typical TTL gates have enough internal current sinking capability so that even one with an internal pullup resistor shunting the 3K external one will work just fine if you leave the 3K resistor in place. I hope that clears up any question you have. Incidentally, the logic board of the Newell (or other) upgrade has only to "compute" the correct bit value for that one output at all times, in order to make the upgrade work. This means thinking up the right bit for each phase of the Phase 2 clock, and of course taking into account whether or not the ANTIC chip temporarily wants to do something, in which case it will assert its HALT output line, telling the 6502 CPU to halt. When that happens, the upgrade logic has to say "hmm... ANTIC wants the memory. What values does it want for Bits 16 and 17". That's where Newell assumed it would always want to stay on the main memory segment in the 16-32K region. He then suggested a switch to let it follow the banked memory, which allows XLENT's Typesetter to work. The 130XE lets $D301 Bit 5 control this choice. Newell's design will turn out to be incompatible if anyone ever uses the 130XE capability of dynamically changing this convention. I have tried to urge Wes Newell to redesign the board to follow the Atari 130XE convention more closely, but so far to no avail. I have proposed several variants of a scheme that would be more compatible (David Young seems to agree on this), but so far have not convinced Newell that it would be worth the effort to change the circuit. If a lot of other potential customers were to bug him about it, he might possibly become convinced. -John Sangster jhs@mitre-bedford.arpa