[mod.ai] Seminar - Naive Physics: Knowledge in Pieces

admin%cogsci@UCBVAX.BERKELEY.EDU (Cognitive Science Program) (01/23/86)

                         BERKELEY COGNITIVE SCIENCE PROGRAM
                                     Spring 1986
                        Cognitive Science Seminar - IDS 237B

                        Tuesday, January 28, 11:00 - 12:30
[NB. New Location]                2515 Tolman Hall
                      Discussion: 12:30 - 1:30  [location TBA]

                               ``Knowledge in Pieces''
                                  Andrea A. diSessa
                  Math Science and Technology, School of Education

                                      Abstract
                Naive  Physics  concerns  expectations,  descriptions  and
           explanations about the way the physical world works that people
           seem spontaneously to develop through interaction with  it.   A
           recent  upswing in interest in this area, particularly concern-
           ing the relation of naive physics to  the  learning  of  school
           physics,  has  yielded significant interesting data, but little
           in the way of a theoretical foundation.  I would like  to  pro-
           vide  a  sketch of a developing theoretical frame together with
           many examples that illustrate it.

                In broad strokes, one sees a rich but rather shallow (in a
           sense  I  will  define),  loosely coupled knowledge system with
           elements that originate often as minimal abstractions of common
           phenomena.  Rather than a "change of theory" or even a shift in
           content of the  knowledge  system,  it  seems  that  developing
           understanding  of  classroom physics may better be described in
           terms of a change in  structure  that  includes  selection  and
           integration  of  naive knowledge elements into a system that is
           much less data-driven, less context dependent, more capable  of
           "reliable"  (in  a  technical  sense) descriptions and explana-
           tions.  In addition I would like to discuss  some  hypothetical
           changes at a systematic level that do look more like changes of
           theory or belief.  Finally, I would like to consider the poten-
           tial  application  of  this work to other domains of knowledge,
           and the relation  to  other  perspectives  on  the  problem  of
           knowledge.