[mod.ai] AI books and paper

jon@JUNE.CS.WASHINGTON.EDU (Jon Jacky) (03/16/87)

Eric Sandberg-Diment's regular column in the business section of 
the NEW YORK TIMES, called "The
Executive Computer", this Sunday (3/15/87, p. F18, National Edition) reviews
two popular books on computing: Grant Fjermdahl's THE TOMORROW MAKERS and
Theodore Roszak's THE CULT OF INFORMATION (he criticizes both as being
extreme views).  At the end, Sandberg-Diment adds: 

The artificial intelligence community and, in fact, the entire computer
cabal are nevertheless trying to mislead us into accepting the notion that
the difference between the "mind" of the computer and the mind of man is
merely a matter of degree, and that not only will this difference be
eliminated in short order, but soon people will rank second to computers in
their cognitive abilities and responsiveness.

In contemplating this thesis, the article "Computer system reliability and
nuclear war," by Alan Borning in the February 1987 issue of Communications
of the ACM ($12 from the ACM, Order Dept., POB 64145, Baltimore, MD  21264)
is must reading.  Published in a journal not normally decipherable by the
average individual, it is probably the clearest essay to date on why the
Strategic Defense Initiative is both inevitable and doomed to failure.

Here is an instance where information filtering cannot be gainsaid, for
there is no way the nonspecialist could successfully draw on the 140-plus
sources the author used as background for his thesis.  The article is also
one that leaves the reader with a sense of fatalism, along with perhaps an
unspoken addendum to Samuel Johnson's observation that "the future is
purchased by the present" -- how expensive it all will be in terms of
humanity.  At a time when there is a very real danger of our subjugating
ourselves to machines to an extent far greater than already realized,
readings such as these may well be all that keep our minds from becoming
irreversibly enslaved."


-Jonathan Jacky
University of Washington