XBR2D96D@DDATHD21.BITNET (Knobi der Rechnerschrat) (07/22/86)
Hallo,
we (see below) consider buying one or two high performance 32-Bit
graphic workstations.
During the process of selection and evaluation we found in the
"Dataquest Research Newsletter 1986-7" a comparison between
Apollo-Domain (DN580), Sun 160C and 3 other workstations. There is a
table that says:
Relative performance (1 is best, 5 is worst)
Apollo DN580 xxx yyy zzz Sun 3/160C
Computing 3 4 5 2 1
Graphics 1 5 4 2 3
Networkng 1 3 5 4 2
Applic. 2 5 4 1 3
My questions are:
a.) Where does the 3 for Apollo Computing come from?
b.) Where does the 3 for Sun 3/160C graphics come from?
I would be most grateful if people who really know the answer
(Dataquest) could send me a short (or long) explanation.
PLEASE respond directly to <XBR2D96D@DDATHD21>, because I'm not a
member of this list.
Regards
Martin Knoblauch
TH-Darmstadt
Dept. Physical Chemistry 1
Petersenstrasse 20
D-6100 Darmstadt
West-Germany
BITNET: <XBR2D96D@DDATHD21>