[net.sf-lovers] Dhalgren and the Nebula

hsut@pur-ee.UUCP (Yuk Hsu) (08/27/85)

	I've stayed out of the Dhalgren controversy so far, despite
being one of the most rabid (tho not vocal) Delany fans on the net.
A few remarks about Delany and the Nebula award...

	As somebody else (Jerry Boyajian, I think) pointed out,
Dhalgren did NOT win a Nebula award. Delany won four Nebulas,
for Babel-17, Einstein Intersection, Aye and Gomorrah, and 
Time Considered as a Helix of Semi-precious Stones. Dhalgren was
nominated in 1976 but finished third (according to a SF reference book,
title available on request). The winner was Joe Haldeman's Forever War,
and Niven/Pournelle's Mote In God's Eye came in second. Both of these
are fine books, in my opinion perhaps not as daring as Dhalgren, but
perhaps more technically finished (this is not to say that Dhalgren
was sloppily written.) HOWEVER, Dhalgren did come ahead of such
fine nominees as Michael Bishop's A Funeral for the Eyes of Fire,
Italo Calvino's Invisible Cities (which I don't consider SF or fantasy),
Tanith Lee's Birthgrave, Joanna Russ' Female Man, Robert Silverberg's
The Stochastic Man, and Zelazney's Doorways in the Sand. I am not
implying that Dhalgren is better (or worse) then the listed books.
There are always lots of politics involved in awards (and that
includes the Nebula), so I personally use them only as references
rather than as measures of quality. (Sometime in the future, I
may post an article on great SF books NEVER nominated for a Nebula.
Hmm, that would make a great poll. Is there interest out there?)

	As far as I'm aware of, Dhalgren did not finish in the top 5
for the Hugo (Forever War also won the Hugo.) Triton was nominated
for the 1977 Nebulas and did not finish in the top 3 (Pohl's Man Plus
won.) The Tale of Gorgik (from Tales of Neveryon) finished 3rd in
the balloting for best novella, 1980. Also, as far as I know, Stars In
My Pocket like Grains of Sand was not nominated for 1984's Nebulas.
I'm sure it came out around Christmas of 1984, so it should be 
eligible. And Nova was noimated for the 1969 Hugos but did not
finish in the top 2 (Nova was not nominated for the Nebula.)

	While I enjoyed Dhalgren enough to read it several times, I
do feel that it is flawed in some ways. Perhaps some sections could
have been more concise, and it is somewhat self-indulgent (though some
people, including myself, do not consider this to be a fault!)
It is a narrative of experience, and it tries to suck the reader
into the totality of the experience of the protagonist. Personally,
I do not find it unreadable (though that is again an subjective thing.)
There are many clever little things going on in the book to hold my
attention through its 900 pages. While I feel that SF fans (or anyone
who enjoys reading) who want a challenge and a different reading
experience should try Dhalgren, I don't expect everybody to like it.

	What Delany learned in writing Dhalgren, Triton and the Neveryon
books have borne fruit in Stars in My Pocket like Grains of Sand.
This is a rich, fascinating book, very different from Dhalgren. Since
I posted a review of Stars many months ago, I'll just plug that 
the paperback edition of Stars has been out for a few weeks, and that
it is a very readable and interesting book, despite not having won
the Nebula.


			Bill "Delany-historian" Hsu
			pur-ee!hsut

tom@utcsri.UUCP (Tom Nadas) (08/29/85)

I visited Delany in July to interview him for the Canadian Broadcasting
Corporation's IDEAS radio program.  He uses his four Nebulas for
bookends -- _now_ that's a classy bookshelf.

	Robert J. Sawyer
	Posted through the good graces of Tom Nadas
	CSRI -- University of Toronto