CP.PAVER@MCC.COM (Bob Paver) (01/06/87)
Anyone have any experience with either 20/20 or Graphic Outlook? It's
getting down to decision time.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Bob Paver (512) 338-3316
Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corp. (MCC)
3500 West Balcones Center Drive
Austin, TX 78759
ARPA: paver@mcc.com
UUCP: {ihnp4,seismo,harvard,gatech}!ut-sally!im4u!milano!paver
-------"Eric_S._Fanwick.STHQ"@XEROX.COM (01/08/87)
At a previous job, I was Systems Programmer for a site that had both 20/20 and All-in-1. I linked 20/20 into the All-in-1 environment. My users found 20/20 to be an excellent product. We set up a TI 7221 plotter for graphic output which worked very well. The one complaint was that it should be more like Lotus 123 in it's command set. I have heard that in later version 20/20 has done this. I don't know. Eric S. Fanwick System Engineer Xerox
dww@seismo.CSS.GOV@stl.stc.co.uk (01/31/87)
We did have CALC-11, but it was so poor that we decided to drop it and find something better. We now use 20/20; people here are generally very happy with it. Although powerful, the help facilities make it easy to learn. Until recently we could not use the built-in plot facilities, but we now have an LN03+, on which 20/20 can produce very smart charts. (Not on the straight LN03 though. I assume that 20/20 uses the Tektronix mode of the LN03+, which the LN03 does not have).