[mod.computers.vax] VaxStars and RD54s

"FRODO::MOSS@cs.umass.EDU".UUCP (03/28/87)

As promised, I am reporting back what I have been able to learn about this
issue.

1) I have it on reasonable authority that there is no technical reason an
RD54 should not work in a VaxStar, even though some people mentioned they
thought it possible that an RD54 would draw too much power or produce too
much heat for reliable operation of the system unit. The feasibility is
supported by the fact that in earlier seminars on upcoming products the RD54
had been mentioned in connection with VaxStars as one of the drives likely
to be supported.

2) The configuration is certainly not supported by DEC now; there are
rumblings that it might be at some later time, perhaps as early as some
point in the next six months.

3) While one can purchase a diskless VaxStar, and a "bare" RD54, it is not
yet known what problems there will be mounting the drive in the cabinet or
connecting it for power and signals. To solve this problem (cables in
particular), my sales rep is going to check with field service and see if
the necessary cables can be had as a spare part (assuming the cables are the
same ones as for an RD53). This still leaves the mounting issue, though.

Why DEC does not offer and support the RD54 for VaxStars has not become
clear. It may be a marketing decision to force purchase of more powerful and
expensive systems, or based on the belief that it's not something many
customers would want to do. Or it may have been a marketing or technical
decision based more on timing -- wanting to get the VaxStar out even though
some group is not quite ready to announce an RD54 offering for it. Also,
RD54s are selling well, with quite a backlog of orders, and so will
VaxStars, and an RD54 option now would only create more of a backlog. This
is all speculation, and it could be some, all, or none of these reasons. But
I think it wouldn't hurt to let your sales rep know that this is something
you want available if you would consider buying it. Another thing that has
been mentioned is that RD54s are noisy and that people might not like them
on their desk.

My recommendation is that if you are at all conservative, you should wait
and see what DEC offers, and possibly agitate for an offering of RD54
configurations. I am being adventurous and forging ahead to try it out,
especially since the department's facilities manager is game (he said our
technical folks could manufacture any necessary cables, etc.) and not overly
concerned with voiding warranties, etc.

It will be two months or more before we receive any of the equipment and can
perform definitive tests. And in the meantime I may find out more, too,
which I will report if it's significant. Thanks to everyone who responded
to my question.

						Eliot Moss
						Ass't Prof.