[net.sf-lovers] Illustrated books and "large" print

ZEVE@RED.RUTGERS.EDU (09/12/85)

From: Steven J. Zeve <ZEVE@RED.RUTGERS.EDU>

Note : this is intended as an informational response to the message
listing criteria for buying a book, not as a rebuttal of any of
the criteria listed.

Although I'm not keen on the novellas padded to novel length with
illustrations, I did see/hear an assertion that it was a fairly recent
affectation that lead to publications of novels w/o any illustration
at all.  What little evidence I have gathered by personal observation
seems to indicate that this is true, on the other hand they never seem
to have padded novellas to novel length that way in "those days".

At the NASFIC, during question and answer session of one of the panels
(I don't remember which one, I only made it about 4 panels all weekend
and I couldn't tell you which they were if I tried) someone asked a
question that was basically "Why are you trying to rip us off by
printing books with larger print and then charging us the same price
as you do for normal length books with smaller print?  If the you
didn't use that larger print the book would be smaller and we could
pay less for these shorter books.".  An editor/publisher responded by
saying that publishers only started using the smaller print when paper
costs started to go up, and that they did so to save money and keep
the cost of books down, however they would prefer to print all books
with the slightly larger print since they believe it is easier to read
the larger print.

	Steve Z.
-------