[mod.protocols.appletalk] Dealing with brain damaged broadcasts

dk1z#@ANDREW.CMU.EDU.UUCP (01/27/87)

  I sent mail to Bill Croft about this and left a phone message, but I've
received no reply yet. So, it goes out to the public at large.

  We're running a TCP/IP network with many (400+) workstations running
4.2BSD, more than a few Vaxen running 4.2BSD and many other machines out
there. Changing them all over to coping with 4.3 broadcasts is not practical
at the moment and adjusting the gateway software will not do much to help the
problem. 

  Unfortunately for us, the latest KIP insists on using 4.3 broadcast
addresses. (255 instead of 0.) I tried to fake it out in the configuration
file and managed to produce broadcasts on 128.2.232.0 but what I really
wanted was 128.2.0.0 (232 is the local ethernet that the gateway is sitting
on.) No amount of fiddling with the configuration file and atalkatab worked
and my quick attempt to hack the actual code produced a gateway that would
talk to noone. So, before I dive back in with a bit more care, can someone
suggest an ellegant (or even inellegant) way to make the box broadcast on
128.2.0.0?

  Secondly, can someone explain what exactly is meant by "directed
broadcast"? We have a few guesses but I'd like to be sure what the authors
meant by it. Does this mean a subnet broadcast on a different net from the
one you're on?

  Thirdly, does anyone have any details on MacNFS? I saw it at USENIX at the
Kinetics booth, but it was not running at the time so all I know is that it
exists and was written at some university somewhere. Is it going to be public
domain? Where can I get a copy? Etc etc etc.

-David Kovar