[mod.protocols.tcp-ip] IEEE-ISO Brain Death

mo@SEISMO.CSS.GOV (Mike O'Dell) (06/28/86)

It is clear the dreaded ISOOSI virus rotted the brain tissue
of the IEEE committee, but why not solve the problem simply...

(1) ARP is basically part of the mechanism for encapsulating
IP datagrams on a local network.

(2) There is a LSAP (or whatever) assigned for the DOD-IP suite.

So.....

Just change the "official" IP encapsulation to start with a 16-bit
TYPE field, followed by whatever is defined by that field.  With that,
you can get ARP, you can get IP, you can get experimental protocols,
you can get on with your life in spite of the crufty IEEE spec.

Problems?? It breaks things.  Well, so does their change.  And it is
early in the upheaval cycle.

The other alternative is to get an LSAP defined for an EXTENSIBLE
structure, with a field, and an Official Assigner.  That has far
more geopolitical problems than getting IP implementers to use
the "sanctioned" IP encapsulation, but is desirable for more
global reasons.  Anyway, this approach would solve our problem, and
move its administration back into a universe with lower entropy
and more reality.

	-Mike O'Dell

(I guess this is really a "secret" OLD ETHERNET type disguised
as DOD-IP.  So be it.  Someone has to be clever around here.
It sure ain't the people designing standards.)

LYNCH@USC-ISIB.ARPA (Dan Lynch) (06/28/86)

Mike (and others),  This nasty little issue of living in a world
not defined by us is one that can be meaningfully addressed at
the TCP/IP Vendors Workshop at the end of August.  At one
time we will have in one room over 100 different TCP/IP implementation
teams.  WE can discuss not just the technical issues of the best way to
cope with our bretheren in the ISO world, but how to make changes
that are not disastrously disruptive to the customers in the field.
(The most recent problem has been with subnetting and how it gets
incorporated smoothly in the field.   With over 100 different vendors
it is impossible to coordinate release dates for protocol upgrades.)

Meanwhile, perhaps some readers of this list have some experience 
running ISO IP as well as DoD IP on the same Ethernet and can reveal how 
they have dealt with it thus far.

Dan
-------