CSDCTGB@UCLA-CCN.ARPA (Todd Booth 213-825-1933) (10/07/86)
It's time to settle this "commercial vs university" issue. > From: mckee@mitre.ARPA > > I object to moving the discussion of commercial vs university > requirements off of tcp-ip. Then you may wish to send a message to the coordinator of the Digest who intended this digest for the following purpose: "To announce new and expanded services in a timely manner.", according to their advertising in SRI-NIC Netinfo:Interest-Groups-2.txt > The tcp-ip community needs to at least understand, and hopefully > accomodate, the contending views of public and private > organizations. You may be right, but if the main-stream of the group doesn't want to hear about, so be it. The digest wasn't intended to act as a big brother. If you are so interested in this topic, you should be *happy* to start your own digest. (I've set up PC-Token-Ring Digest and can give you a hand.) You may get some interest on your topic regarding products other than tcp-ip. > The discussion should continue on tcp-ip. > H. Craig McKee The next message on "commercial vs university" should be from a volunteer to help with the digest. (If anyone really cares so much that they would help.) Of course, the TCP-IP coordinator can overrule me if I have mis- interpreted the protocol discussion. -todd / UCLA Data Comm ps. CASE CLOSED