[net.sf-lovers] Deus ex machina

bnw@SDCSVAX.ARPA (06/22/85)

From: crash!bnw@SDCSVAX.ARPA

>And then of course, there is the deus ex machina. That beloved
>ending of science fiction, more used than anything. In mainstream
>fiction, it's tough to get away with that kind of ending (we don't
>believe in gods falling out of the sky anymore... sigh). Where the
>writer paints himself into the proverbial corner and voila! Here
>comes the zygomatic thundercruncher's unknown power in all its
>awesome majesty, which of course the villain didn't know anything
>about, since we all know that a villain couldn't see a deus ex
>machina if it came up and bit him, even when it's been telegraphed
>in screaming semaphore for fifty pages. It's either that, or write a
>sequel.
     The Good Guys and the Bad Guys have been fighting a terrible war
for years.  The Good Guys are winning, but the Baddies are clearly
going to fight on, costing countless lives on both sides.
     Happily, the Good Guys have invented The Wonder Weapon.  The 
order is given by True Harry the Great, leader of the Good Guys, and
the terrible force of The Wonder Weapon is unleashed on two cities
of the Bad Guys.  Overwhelmed by this new force, they surrender at
once.
     Good Guys--U.S.A.         Bad Guys--Japan     Year--1945 A.D.
 
     Just thought I'd point out that deus ex machina shows up in 
real life.  (Sadly, however, we've also been doing sequels as often
as possible.)
                                                 /Bruce N. Wheelock/
                   arpanet: crash!bnw@ucsd
                   uucp: {ihnp4, cbosgd, sdcsvax, noscvax}!crash!bnw


minow@decvax.UUCP (Martin Minow) (09/04/85)

The following quotation is from W. R. Yates's book, Diasporah
(Baen Books, 1985):

    "Excuse me, Dr. Greenberg," said a woman's voice, "but I was told
  to wake you in time for dinner."
    Paul jerked from his sleep, but relaxed when he [discovered that]
  the voice was coming from the computer's vox box....
    "Good evening, Gollum," he said.
    "Good evening," returned the emotionless vox box.
    "I've been wanting to talk to you,"  Paul said.
    "Really? What about?"
    "During the Shabbos service on the [space ship] Harpo Martz,"
  Paul said, "you were saying something on the screen.  What was it?"
    "Like any good Jew, I was participating in the service."
    "But you're a computer!" Paul answered.
    "And I am a sentient, rational being, capable of making my own
  decisions," the voice said.  "By that definition, I have a soul."
    "Oh," Paul answered.
    ... [Paul walks downstairs and encounters his host, Dr. Goldstein:]
    "Hello Paul," said Dr. Goldstein.  "How was the nap?"
    "Quite good," declared Paul.  "I feel quite a bit better."
    "You look somewhat confused, Dr. Greenberg.  Is something the
  matter?"
    "Your computer told me that it's a Jew."
    Goldstein laughed.
    "Are all of your computers Jewish?"
    "It depends on how sophisticated they are,"  explained [Dr.
  Goldstein's daughter] Shoshanna, bringing a covered tray from the
  kitchen.  "Sooner or later, the computer runs up against the concepts
  of morality, an dsince our concepts are codified the Talmud, we
  insert a memory of it.  From that point on, all of our computers
  have behaved in a perfectly moral fashion.
    "Sometimes, when working on a complex problem, the logic can be
  a little obtuse, but the computer always has a rational explanation
  -- in terms of the Talmud."

How (theologiclly) realistic is this?

PS: there are two words used in Diasporah that I know to be Swedish
("narkoman" for drug addict and "dator" for computer).  Are these
words found in Hebrew also?

PPS: I know the title of this note is slightly inappropriate, but
it appears to be a valid criticism of the book as literature --
unless the second half is much better than what I've read so far.

Martin Minow
decvax!minow

ethan@utastro.UUCP (Ethan Vishniac) (09/04/85)

[]
A relevant (and amusing) variation in this can be found in
a series of books by Gilliland (the titles all have Rosinante
in them).  A computer named Skakash (spelling?) invents
a religion.
-- 
"Support the revolution        Ethan Vishniac
 in Latin America...           {charm,ut-sally,ut-ngp,noao}!utastro!ethan
    Buy Cocaine"               ethan@astro.UTEXAS.EDU
                               Department of Astronomy
                               University of Texas

tim@cmu-cs-k.ARPA (Tim Maroney) (09/06/85)

How do you circumcise a computer?
-=-
Tim Maroney, Carnegie-Mellon University, Networking
ARPA:	Tim.Maroney@CMU-CS-K	uucp:	seismo!cmu-cs-k!tim
CompuServe:	74176,1360	audio:	shout "Hey, Tim!"

scott@scirtp.UUCP (Scott Crenshaw) (09/06/85)

>     "Are all of your computers Jewish?"
>     "It depends on how sophisticated they are,"  explained [Dr.
>   Goldstein's daughter] Shoshanna, bringing a covered tray from the
>   kitchen.  "Sooner or later, the computer runs up against the concepts
>   of morality, an dsince our concepts are codified the Talmud, we
>   insert a memory of it.  From that point on, all of our computers
>   have behaved in a perfectly moral fashion.
>     "Sometimes, when working on a complex problem, the logic can be
>   a little obtuse, but the computer always has a rational explanation
>   -- in terms of the Talmud."
> 
> How (theologiclly) realistic is this?

	Very unrealistic. There are many (many) reasons why; I'll focus on
two of them.
	Jews are people -- there is no way anything else can be a Jew. For a
gentile to become a Jew is possible; when that takes place the gentile aquires
certain (spiritual) attributes possessed by all Jews. But for an inatimate
to become Jewish -- ridiculous.
	The Talmud requires two types of understanding: a logical, consistent
understanding and one involving love (avodas Hash-m), fear (yiras shomayim) and
other purely human attributes. A computer could never simulate this.
	It is interesting to note that the Israeli rabbinate has placed
much of the Responsa on a computer database, allowing research time to be
shortened. There are many problems with this chief among which is that the
research process is a crucial part of the educational process for those making
halakic decisions which must not be lost. Also, suppose the computer goes
down ?  It must be stressed that the computer in know way takes part in any
decisions ; it is merely and alternative place to store the responsa, instead 
of books.
	I believe that the text of the Talmud has been transfered to disk,
but I don't know for what purpose. 
	Also, there have been a number of statistical analyses performed on
the Torah using computer-based statistical pakages. The results are very
interesting. For instance, in the first two books, every nth letter (I don't
remember what n is) spells 'Torah' , in the last two books, every nth letter
(same n) spells 'Torah' backwards (i.e., if read from back-to-front) and 
in the middle book, every nth letter spells the Name of G-d.  There were 
literally hundreds of similar sequences found. I don't have the information
handy , but if anyone would like more info, send me some e-mail and I'll
look up the place the findings were published.
-- 
	   Scott Crenshaw		{akgua,decvax}!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp
	   SCI Systems , Inc. 		Research Triangle Park, NC 

The views represented may or may not be those of my employer.

smb@ulysses.UUCP (Steven Bellovin) (09/07/85)

> How do you circumcise a computer?

Simple!  Its modems will be connected to the "ring" and "tip" wires of the
phone network.  Cut off a bit of the "tip"...  (The "ring" wire is used in
computer wedding ceremonies, of course.)

ccrdave@ucdavis.UUCP (Lord Kahless) (09/09/85)

> 	Jews are people -- there is no way anything else can be a Jew. For a
                                           ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^
What about the Starchild on V.  She has a Jewish mother and a Lizard
father.  That makes her a Jewish lizard.

br@cstvax.UUCP (Brian Ritchie) (09/18/85)

In article <520@cmu-cs-k.ARPA> tim@cmu-cs-k.ARPA (Tim Maroney) writes:
>How do you circumcise a computer?


-- Maybe you just take off its front end?? :-)

.

hrs@homxb.UUCP (H.SILBIGER) (09/19/85)

How do you circumcise a computer, if it happens to
feel it's male.

Computers would probably never get to be bar/bat-mitsvah,
since their life span is normally less tha 13 years.

Herman Silbiger

showard@udenva.UUCP (showard) (09/24/85)

> How do you circumcise a computer, if it happens to
> feel it's male.
> 
> Computers would probably never get to be bar/bat-mitsvah,
> since their life span is normally less tha 13 years.
> 
> Herman Silbiger
 That doesn't matter.  Circumcision is done at birth, isn't it?

jimb@ISM780B.UUCP (09/28/85)

>> How do you circumcise a computer, if it happens to
>> feel it's male.
>>
>> Computers would probably never get to be bar/bat-mitsvah,
>> since their life span is normally less tha 13 years.
> 
>> Herman Silbiger

> That doesn't matter.  Circumcision is done at birth, isn't it?


Nah, the computer is probably a convert. (but probably not Orthodox!)


      -- I've never seen so many meshugganim in my life --  Jim Brunet

		  decvax!cca!ima!jimb

		  ucbvax!ucla-cs!ism780!jimb

		  ihnp4!vortex!ism780!jimb