oyster@uwmacc.UUCP (Vicious Oyster) (01/03/86)
In article <447@ssc-bee.UUCP> ditzel@ssc-bee.UUCP (Charles L Ditzel) writes: > >>4) Commodore/Amiga has been fairly open and honest about the internal >>structure and functioning of their machine, while by comparison >>Atari has been relatively secretive (specific examples furnished upon >>request). >more nonsense. The first opinion above (>>) is probably due to the fact that Atari is not using the resources (i.e. $$$) of the thousands of universities on USENET to provide product support, whereas the folks at Commodore are. Must be because Atari just doesn't care about it's customers, eh?
grr@unirot.UUCP (George Robbins) (01/03/86)
In article <1874@uwmacc.UUCP> oyster@uwmacc.UUCP (Vicious Oyster) writes: >In article <447@ssc-bee.UUCP> ditzel@ssc-bee.UUCP (Charles L Ditzel) writes: > > The first opinion above (>>) is probably due to the fact that Atari is not >using the resources (i.e. $$$) of the thousands of universities on USENET to >provide product support, whereas the folks at Commodore are. Must be because >Atari just doesn't care about it's customers, eh? Vicious - nasty - argh. Please note that Amiga is providing their primary online discussion on the COMMERCIAL networks - BIX, Delphi, Compuserve and their own developers bulletin board. Would you rather that they didn't read this group and respond to questions? -- George Robbins uucp: ...!ihnp4!tapa!grr P.O. Box 177 ...!caip!unirot!grr Lincoln U, PA 19352 [Any ideas herein are not responsible for themselves!]