mcb@k.cs.cmu.edu (Michael Browne) (05/07/86)
Didn't some one announce an Aztec C version of Amiga Hack? If so, could this person please supply me with the diffs between the Lattice and Aztec version? If not, could some Lattice C user at least explain the distributed _main.c (variables in particular) and the compilation flags in ccall? Thanks. --Mike -- UUCP: ..!seismo!k.cs.cmu.edu!mcb ARPA: mcb@k.cs.cmu.edu "It came time to move, so I packed up my Salvador Dali print of two blindfolded dental hygienists trying to make a circle on an Etch-a-Sketch..."
daveb@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (Dave Berezowski) (05/09/86)
> Didn't some one announce an Aztec C version of Amiga Hack? If so, could > this person please supply me with the diffs between the Lattice and Aztec > version? If not, could some Lattice C user at least explain the distributed > _main.c (variables in particular) and the compilation flags in ccall? Thanks. > --Mike > -- > UUCP: ..!seismo!k.cs.cmu.edu!mcb ARPA: mcb@k.cs.cmu.edu I have converted Amiga Hack 1.01 under Lattice C to run under Aztec C. Unfortunately, the changes are too extensive to just supply you with a diffs. The changes are conditional however with the flag AZTEC turning them on. I should warn you of a couple of problems a) there is a bug in the source code in the file hack.shk.c b) the Lattice make file's dependencies are incomplete - I had to make up some new ones c) the program crashes randomly; which I attribute to bugs in the compiler which Manx is aware of and fixing. When I get the new version of the compiler I'll try again. If that version seems to work ok, I'll release it. Also, a friend of mine is converting the PCDos 1.03 version of Hack to run on the AMIGA and is basically stuck at the same point. So, when he gets the new version of the compiler, there may be a HACK 1.03 for the Amiga!!!!! Regards, David Berezowski (daveb@cbmvax) The usual disclaimers (ho hum).