dillon@PAVEPAWS.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon) (06/10/86)
By the way, if you have found the same bug (very likely), you should post a bug report too, so C-A can compare similar bug-reports and *really* get down to the bottom of things. Question to C-A: Is it possible we can send bug reports on 1.2BII to some net-address rather than send them in via mail? -Matt Disclaimer: And in no way do I work for, or look to, C-A. My software is my own, and there's a butterfly sitting on my nose.
jimm@amiga.UUCP (Jim Mackraz) (06/11/86)
In article <8606101842.AA15554@pavepaws> dillon@PAVEPAWS.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon) writes: > > By the way, if you have found the same bug (very likely), you should >post a bug report too, so C-A can compare similar bug-reports and *really* >get down to the bottom of things. > > Question to C-A: Is it possible we can send bug reports on 1.2BII >to some net-address rather than send them in via mail? > -Matt I suggest you electronically send them rather than clutter the net, unless you think one is very interesting. address is {decwrl,hplabs}!pyramid!amiga!nancy there are certainly other paths to pyramid. jimm
grr@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (George Robbins) (06/11/86)
In article <1279@amiga.amiga.UUCP> jimm@homer.UUCP (Jim Mackraz) writes: >In article <8606101842.AA15554@pavepaws> dillon@PAVEPAWS.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon) writes: >> >> Question to C-A: Is it possible we can send bug reports on 1.2BII >>to some net-address rather than send them in via mail? >> -Matt > >I suggest you electronically send them rather than clutter the net, unless you >think one is very interesting. address is ^^^^^^^^^^^ > {decwrl,hplabs}!pyramid!amiga!nancy > jimm * Where interesting can be defined as either: 1) You think other developrs should be be told about the bug before they find it themselves. 2) You wish someone had told you about it before it bit you... Note to East Coast sites: the path ...!cbmvax!amiga!... DOES NOT currently work for mail/uucp due to the wonders of sendmail.cf and ultrix decnet support. However, mail sent to ...!cbmvax!nancy or cbmvax!nancy@seismo.css.GOV will be forwarded promptly and automatically. -- George Robbins - now working with, uucp: {ihnp4|seismo|caip}!cbmvax!grr but no way officially representing arpa: cbmvax!grr@seismo.css.GOV Commodore, Engineering Department fone: 215-431-9255 (only by moonlite)
jdg@elmgate.UUCP (Jeff Gortatowsky) (06/13/86)
In article <8606101842.AA15554@pavepaws>, dillon@PAVEPAWS.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon) writes: > > Question to C-A: Is it possible we can send bug reports on 1.2BII > to some net-address rather than send them in via mail? > > > -Matt > > Disclaimer: And in no way do I work for, or look to, C-A. My software is > my own, and there's a butterfly sitting on my nose. I believe this to be an EXCELLENT idea. Remember those bug reports that were going out on Wednesday? Yup, still on my desk (it's Friday). How 'bout C-A? Further, some people don't care about the bug reports and don't want them mixed in with the news. -- Jeff Gortatowsky {allegra,seismo}!rochester!kodak!elmgate!jdg Eastman Kodak Company <Kodak won't be responsible for the above comments, only those below>
jimm@amiga.UUCP (Jim Mackraz) (06/14/86)
In article <472@elmgate.UUCP> jdg@elmgate.UUCP (Jeff Gortatowsky) writes: >In article <8606101842.AA15554@pavepaws>, dillon@PAVEPAWS.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon) writes: >> >> Question to C-A: Is it possible we can send bug reports on 1.2BII >> to some net-address rather than send them in via mail? >> >I believe this to be an EXCELLENT idea. Remember those bug reports that >were going out on Wednesday? Yup, still on my desk (it's Friday). > >How 'bout C-A? > >Further, some people don't care about the bug reports and don't want them >mixed in with the news. >Jeff Gortatowsky My thoughts exactly. My words, almost exactly :-), but really, I have something to add. Previous postings have encouraged emailing bugs, but I have a new improved address: {hplabs,decwrl,...}!pyramid!amiga!support We promise: for the time being, nancy will still be reading them. (And also, they appear in an internal newsgroup automatically, which is good.) By the way, thanks to all those who have sent their bugs in! jimm