[mod.politics] Libertarianism attacked, part I

cowan@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU (09/23/86)

Libertarianism seems suspect.  Why do I say this?  Because several
recent messages have labeled both left-wing and right-wing views as
"libertarian."  How could this be so?  Is it that Libertarians are
fixated on the danger of "big government" affecting our freedom, and
that this focus on government serves to mystify what's really going
on?

The reason I object to the emphasis on government is that public
policy is really not determined by "the government."  As Noam Chomsky
said in 1969, "This is a caricature, and a dangerous one.  We must
emphasize that ..  public policy is a reflection, to a very
significant extent, of economic power that is entirely removed from
the political process."  (MIT Review Panel on Special Laboratories,
Final Report)

Chomsky is saying that it's the other way around.  The government is
controlled by the political process, a process greatly influenced by
economic interests.  Senator Mark Hatfield (R-Oregon) had a similar
perspective, urging "the reintroduction of human ideals into what is
now policy formed mainly by economic considerations."  (personal
correspondence, 1969) In other words, Money is Power.

Accepting this view, the question one should ask is not whether
government is inherently good or bad, but rather, "Who runs the
government?" and "Who does it serve?"

-rich
-------
-------