[mod.politics] Poli-Sci Digest V6 #72

SMITH@SLACVM.BITNET (10/02/86)

CWM says in commentary about Keith's "TV" in poli-sci V6 # 72:

>       ...I'm surprised that you are so down on TV shows 'sameness'.
>The producers of most TV shows operate on the principles you hold
>dear: sell what people want.  If people don't want what they sell,
>they watch something else.  If a show stays on the air, people are
>watching it.  If the producers of TV shows don't have much
>imagination, well, that's too bad.  As to a 'liberal blandness',
>perhaps it is the people who run the stations that have this bias.
>Jesse Helms, before he became a Senator, was vice-president of 
>Capital Broadcasting in North Carolina (Channel 5, Raleigh).  He 
>gave an editorial every night.  If you think that was a 'liberal 
>blandness', think again. - CWM]....

I purged TV almost completely out of my life 10 years ago and am over
99% TV clean. My suggestion to everyone: Read Instead. You have more
control over what you read. You can read someone you have strong
disagreements with, but the time is well spent because at least you
are in the presence of an elevated mind. TV is a superb instrament for
disception, after all it's mostly someone elses carefully chosen
pictures.

TV and I parted ways was because I heard one too many "News"
commentators introduce themselves as a "molder of public opinion".  Is
that what commentators are taught at broadcasting school?  Who put
this type of mentality into the "News" curriculum?  Also, there is a
very well known Hollywood producer of TV sitcoms (who reachs perhaps
150 million americans per week) who was interviewed and said quite
bluntly :"I view it as my mission to mold the values of the american
people". I think he was serious and that he is succesful. The most
successful type of brainwashing is when the victim doesn't even
realize that is is happening and say to themselves with pride "I'm
educated, I'm intelligent, You can't fool me".

John R. Smith
smith%slacvm.bitnet@wiscvm.arpa

[ Curiously enough, I think that many book writers have the same
opinion of themselves.  Anyone seen or heard by many millions of
people has the opportunity to mold opinion.  In the late 1800's and
early 1900's, this power fell to the 'moguls of the press' - the
owners of big newspaper chains.  With the advent of radio, it moved to
radio and then to TV.  I don't think the answer is to damn the medium
because some people in the medium take themselves a little
over-seriously, or because some people rely on it for all their
opinions.

   The difference between us then is I choose to watch TV.  I read
too.  I also go to the movies.  I talk to people.  My opinions come
from a blend of all these.  In the same way you choose what you read,
I choose what I watch.  I feel no need to 'purge' myself of Star Trek,
HBO, The Prisoner, C-Span, CNN, John McLaughlin, or MTV (yes, even
MTV) just because some bozo on TV tells me what he thinks I should
think.  Bozos write books too.  - CWM]
-------