kfl@AI.AI.MIT.EDU (01/20/87)
From: Graham Wilson <gawilson%watrose.waterloo.edu@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA> Up here in Canada we are constantly being bombarded by government-sponsored commercials telling us to quit smoking. What irks me is that (some of) the funds for this advertising comes from taxation on cigarettes. Put into general terms: Company X produces product Y. The government taxes company X and product Y at very high rates (relative to other products). The government then turns around and uses these funds to discourage people from purchasing product Y! Is that fair or ethical? I oppose all taxes, as I have said before. However, judged in the context of our current system, the cigarette tax is one of the fairer taxes. The costs of smoking are subsidized by non-smokers in several ways: 1) Non-smokers often have to breathe smoke. This is unpleasant, smells bad, irritates the eyes, and has medical consequences that smokers are not billed for. 2) In airplanes, restraunts, etc, with seperate smoking and non-smoking sections, smokers are not billed any more than non-smokers. Since the seperate sections cost the airlines, restraunts, etc, something, non-smokers have to pay more than they would if there were no smoking anywhere. 3) Government subsidies for tobacco farmers. 4) Careless smokers cause fires which kill non-smokers and destroy the property of non-smokers. Taxes for fire departments are not made higher for smokers. 5) Federal laws now mandate that upholstery be made fireproof, since so many careless smokers managed to start major fires. The fire- proofing makes upholstery more expensive, less comfortable, and more likely to cause cancer. 6) Much medical care is paid for by the taxpayers. Smokers need much more medical care, but pay no higher taxes for it. 7) Most private medical insurance is paid for through one's employer. Federal and state laws discourage or prohibit seperate insurance rates for smokers and non-smokers in such a group policy. Thus the non-smokers subsidize the smokers again. 8) Smokers are more likely to get contagious diseases. They then often spread these diseases to non-smokers. This is true in the US. I believe it is probably pretty much the same in Canada. I think that adults have a right to smoke, but do not have a right to force others to breathe their smoke, or to bear the costs and other consequences of their habit. I have the same opinion of all other drugs. ...Keith -------