[net.sf-lovers] Book Recommendations

DBarker@HIS-PHOENIX-MULTICS.ARPA (02/06/84)

Alfred Bester is certainly not unknown in England (well no more than any
SF  author  is  unknown!)  BTW  the  English  title  of  "The  Stars  My
Destination"  was  "Tiger  Tiger",  which  anyone  who  has read it will
comprehend.   There are also a couple of books of his short stories, the
titles of which I forget, but they are both excellent.

In  the  same  sort of 1950s space opera genre, may I mention Charles L.
Harness, whose three novels ("The Paradox Men", "The Rose" and "The Ring
of  Ritornel")  I  can heartily recommend, and will submit synopses if I
get   the   time   tomorrow.    Anyone  who  enjoys  late-40s  Van  Vogt
(particularly  the  Null-A  books) will certainly enjoy The Paradox Men,
which  takes as its inspiration Toynbee's theories of history (where Van
Vogt  used  Korzybski's  theories  of General Semantics).  The Rose also
contains  two of the nicest short-stories I know "The Chess Players" and
"The New Reality".

Even  the  people  who  have heard of Bester don't seem to have heard of
Harness!!

ddern@bbnccb@caip.RUTGERS.EDU (02/03/86)

From: "Daniel P. Dern" <ddern@bbnccb.ARPA>

Thanks to all who responded directly or indirectly to my query about
Gordon Dickson's FINAL ENCYCLOPEDIA.  By that point, I was already halfway
into a copy.  I wish to confirm, in my opinion, the book is a "good read."
After reading [pause to don HEFLMP garb] ROBOTS & EMPIRE, and CAT WHO WALKED
THROUGH WALLS, it was gratifying to read a book by an author I've enjoyed
for ~ two decades and have it be 'up to par.'  Dickson is a good writer -
competant enough that he doesn't intrude.  It was clear from the beginning
that he knew in advance where the book was going, and by what route.
And at the end, he had indeed gotten there.  It doesn't hurt to have read
the preceeding books; it certainly gives more context to the events.
Again: a good read.

And here's a new recommendation for a not new book:  SS-BG, by Len Deighton.
Deighton is viewed as a suspense/intrigue writer, author of FUNERAL IN 
BERLIN and all sorts of other neat books.  This one is SF a la Phillip
Dick's MAN IN THE HIGH CASTLE -- a parallel world.  Here, England 
surrendered to Germany early during World War II.  The book takes place
in the early 1940s.  It's reasonably complex.  Like many murder
mysteries, it doesn't untangle until the very end.  Books like this
are a good example of why many people DON'T like SF, in a way -- this one
is well written, well paced, with good characters, etc.  It is lightyears
ahead of most sf in terms of quality.  Sure, it's hard to write good sf.
It's also easy to write bad sf.  Whether it's the genre, the tradition,
or the readership, the suspense & intrigue books are on the average
better than average sf, or certainly more competant, or whatever the
metric is.  Or else I've only been reading the better ones of this sibling
ghetto/genre.

Daniel Dern
ddern@bbn.arpa

scifi@ukc.ac.uk (I.L.Sewell) (02/04/86)

In article <1166@caip.RUTGERS.EDU> daemon@caip.UUCP writes:
>From: "Daniel P. Dern" <ddern@bbnccb.ARPA>
>
>Thanks to all who responded directly or indirectly to my query about
>Gordon Dickson's FINAL ENCYCLOPEDIA.  By that point, I was already halfway
>into a copy.  I wish to confirm, in my opinion, the book is a "good read."
>After reading [pause to don HEFLMP garb] ROBOTS & EMPIRE, and CAT WHO WALKED
>THROUGH WALLS, it was gratifying to read a book by an author I've enjoyed
>for ~ two decades and have it be 'up to par.'  Dickson is a good writer -
>competant enough that he doesn't intrude.  It was clear from the beginning
>that he knew in advance where the book was going, and by what route.
>And at the end, he had indeed gotten there.  It doesn't hurt to have read
>the preceeding books; it certainly gives more context to the events.
>Again: a good read.

The book may be a good read but in my opinion you read 500+ pages to get ..well
no where really. I agree Dickson is a good writer I wouldn't have the book
otherwise, and he keeps you hooked right to the end where the book falls flat
on its face. Okay there is nothing wrong with the end but as the culmination of
a twelve(?) volume saga and 500+ pages you expect a bit of a climax. In fact
the book is such written that a climax is really expected, okay not a galactic
war but al least a confrontation with an ending and not the 'okay you've beaten
me at the moment but I'll get back at you sometime ' we were given. This really
spoilt the whole book for me.
 Okay now you can flame!

Ian Sewell
 "Its winter and your all leaves - BANG"