[net.sf-lovers] Dictionary of obscure words

stever@vlsi.caltech.edu@caip.RUTGERS.EDU (02/05/86)

From: stever@vlsi.caltech.edu (Steve Rabin  )

  In the (good) old days, dictionaries seldom bothered defining the
  common words of a language - words like: the, a, and, but, for -
  because "everyone knew what they meant" and it seemed only useful
  to list and define words whose meanings were somewhat obscure.
  Today, when the acknowledged function of dictionaries has changed,
  in keeping with modern linguistic and lexicographical theory, to
  become "a description of the lexicon of a language", the shorter
  the dictionary, the greater the proportion of space devoted to the
  listing, pronouncing, and defining of "the words everyone knows".

  The Everyday Reader's Dictionary of Misunderstood, Misused, and
  Mispronounced Words contains what must be a selection based on
  personal choice: it doesn't pretend to contain every word that
  people are likely to misunderstand, misuse, or mispronounce and
  it probably contains words that are quite familiar to some users.

  Some of the words have been chosen because they have appeared in
  popular newspapers and magazines, and I thought they were uncommon
  enough to be included - words like obsecrate, neoteric, nugatory,
  splenetic, hegemony, exiguous, and flagitious.  Others, words like
  lestobiosis, lyncean, renifleur, fuliginous, ochlesis, oscitant,
  and nimiety, have been included because their meanings are readily
  applied in ordinary writing and speaking yet the words themselves
  are seldom seen or heard.  It seemed rather fun to include these.

  By and large, technical and scientific words have been omitted
  with the two exceptions of anatomical terms and diseases because
  it was felt that so much conversation and writing centers on 
  these subjects.

  The editor would welcome, for future editions of this work, 
  receiving comments on entries and, particularly, on omissions,
  though the latter should be accompanied by documentary 
  evidence of their use.

  This is not a succedaneum for satisfying the nympholepsy of
  nullifidians.  Rather it is hoped that the haecceity of this
  enchiridion of arcane and recondite sesquipedalian items will
  appeal to the oniomania of an eximious Gemeinschaft whose
  legerity and sophrosyne, whose Sprachgefuhl and orexis will
  find more than fugacious fulfillment among its felicific pages.

- Forward to the first edition, "New York Times Everyday Reader's
  Dictionary of Misunderstood, Misused, and Mispronounced Words",
  by Laurence Urdang. Time Books/Random House.

And if you like this, you also might like

  "Listening to America, An Illustrated History of Words and Phrases
  from our Lively and Splendid Past", by Stuart Berg Flexner.