[net.nlang.india] NEED for a MODERATOR - INDIA & US MEDIA

hector@alberta.UUCP (Hector Hernandez) (04/01/85)

> >> 
> >>                      INDIA AND THE US MEDIA - A SUGGESTION
>                       =====================================
> 
> >NONSENSE and personal "glorification" should be banned
> >from your net; otherwise lots of "Pinaki"'s will
> >spring up making your net very little more than a gossip-like 
> >electronic magazine.
> >H. Hernandez/ Grad. Student./ U. of Alberta (alberta!hector)
> 
>>>>>>>>> Whom is this self-righteous *i__ot* referring to in 
> 	"your net" ? 

I would strongly suggest you to immediatley get a common-sense
PERSON to act as the moderator for this net. Otherwise,
more disgusting and bad-behaved ambassador-extraordinaries 
of your dearest country will show off themselves.
See the above reply to my previous message from one indian of this kind.

Persons like him/her must be even banned the right of TRYING
to "think."

H. Hernandez/ U.ofA. / alberta!hector

jis1@ahutb.UUCP (j.mukerji) (04/02/85)

REFERENCES:  <125@iitcs.UUCP> <430@alberta.UUCP> <1504@ut-ngp.UUCP> <437@alberta.UUCP>

Lines beginning with a > in the following are quoted from an article
<437@alberta> by Mr. Hector Hernandez. The unmarked lines are mine.

> I would strongly suggest you to immediatley get a common-sense
> PERSON to act as the moderator for this net. Otherwise,
> more disgusting and bad-behaved ambassador-extraordinaries 
> of your dearest country will show off themselves.
> See the above reply to my previous message from one indian of this kind.

I would strongly oppose any suggestions for any kind of moderation of this
newsgroup. If any "bad-behaved ambassador-extraordinaries" do make an ass of
themselves on the net, they should be dealt with on a case by case basis.
That technique seems to have worked fine until now. The only acceptable
reason (in my opinion) to moderate a newsgroup is to cut down network
traffic by consolidating material in a shorter format.

Your reason for moderating seems to be really to censor articles, and
general censorship is simply not acceptable. Come to think of it, the
moderator (read censor) would probably have knocked out the following
self-righteous piece of junk from Mr. Hernandez to start with!

> >NONSENSE and personal "glorification" should be banned
> >from your net; otherwise lots of "Pinaki"'s will
> >spring up making your net very little more than a gossip-like 
> >electronic magazine.
> >H. Hernandez/ Grad. Student./ U. of Alberta (alberta!hector)
> 

You would not want you piece to be "moderated" out, would you now? :-)

>
> Persons like him/her must be even banned the right of TRYING
> to "think."

Banned the right of TRYING to "think"?? You must be kidding! Who are you
Mr. Hernandez?  Adolf Hitler? Wouldn't you love to stuff everyone that
happens to raise your cockles slightly, straight into a concentration camp -
perhaps into the gas chamber? Take it easy on us mortals who err in ruffling
you feathers :-)

Talking of "banning", maybe we could start off by voting to ban you Mr.
Hernandez,  from the net. But that is not acceptable either, because you
have as much right to express your opinion, however perverse, as anyone
else! So have fun and enjoy!

Jishnu Mukerji
AT&T Information Systems Labs.
Holmdel  NJ

- Freedom of speech and expression is sacrosanct...

kumar@hplabsc.UUCP (Arvind Kumar) (04/04/85)

Don't know about moderators, but here is another vote for
temperance in this newsgroup.

I enjoy reading most postings to this newsgroup, and find the
news snippets informative.  If you have been disappointed
by some of the recent uncivil postings here, please speak up.
Those who have a pressing need to use bad language and launch 
personal attacks on total strangers should do it somewhere else.