[net.nlang.india] CASTEISM & RESERVATION: TWO POINTS

mazum@iitcs.UUCP (Pinaki Mazumder) (05/16/85)

                   CASTEISM & RESERVATION: TWO POINTS
                   ==================================
      POINT #1:
           Caste issue has evoked a strong debate in the  net  and
      very  unwisely many readers who are not well versed with the
      Hindu religion can be misled to conclude that the  "casteism
      by  birth"  is  a  theory propounded by the religion and the
      nascent concept of "reservation" is to undo the  "injustice"
      meted  out  to  the  underprivileges (lower castes) over the
      centuries by the religious  high  priests  (higher  castes).
      The  concept of "casteism" can be definitely traced into the
      holy scripts of Hindu religion like the Gita (slokas  4/13),
      the Manu Samhita, the Ayteraya Purana (1/16), the Mahavarata
      (215/190), etc., and these references  have  strongly  advo-
      cated   the  "chaturvarna"  (inappropriately  identified  as
      "casteism")  theory.  Very  frequently,  many  crusaders  of
      "casteism"  accuse  the Hindu religion by alluding the above
      sources. But it may be clarified that the concept  of  "cha-
      turvarna"  was  proposed by the sages in the olden days as a
      theory of allocation of the social work and it was developed
      as  a  strategy  of  best exploitation of human faculty. The
      sages of the past partitioned  the  whole  domain  of  human
      activities into four generic classes and they identified the
      three attributes (known as Satto,  Rajo  and  Tamo)  in  the
      human nature as the criteria for assignment of these classes
      of tasks. The restriction of  the  policy  was  to  exercise
      one's  faculty  within the scope of one's assigned class. In
      the olden days, this assignment of task was done strictly on
      the  basis  of  the ability of a man and not on his lineage.
      The concept of "casteism" or "work assignment by birth" is a
      degenerated practice of "chaturvarna" owing to the fact that
      on the average the faculty of a man is the manifestation  of
      his  acquisition from the environment around him. The famous
      Indologist Maxmuller corroborates the above arguement in his
      work:

          If then with all documents before  us,  we  ask  the
          question, does caste as we find at present day, form
          part of the most ancient religious teaching  of  the
          Vedas? We can answer with a decided NO.

                                  Chips from a German Workshop

      POINT #2:
           Now that it is established that the "casteism" is not a
      religious  sanction  and  it  was  a  corrupt  manoeuevre to
      exploit the people, like any other policy  designed  by  the
      economically  priveleged people to aggrandize their economic
      goal, is "reservation" a well-thought solution to reduce the
      social  inequity?  A   certain  percentage  of "reservation"
      might be necessary to provide more inducement to the age old
      underpriveleges.  But  a high percentage of "reservation" is
      bound to cause discontent, malpractice and errosion of stan-
      dard.  Malpractices  by  the  social  hawks  who  usurp  the
      "reservation" quotas under the cloak of  SC/ST  by  changing
      their  surname  are rampant in India. Uncouth administrative
      officers (IAS, IPS) holding "reservation" tags do bungle and
      spawn  incompetence. I do not think "reservation" can be the
      panacea which  will  revitalize  the  ailing  socio-economy.
      "Reservation" in the government jobs and in the colleges may
      help a few to be with the Jonses. But a  large  number  (the
      seething  mass  of  millions)  who dwell in the villages and
      those who are in the rock bottom of the economy will  remain
      status  quo  ante. I feel that a better policy to uplift the
      underpriveleges is to reformulate our national economic pol-
      icies.  "Reservation"  is  only a means of allocation within
      the bounds of the existing policy and thereby it is a myopic
      scheme to achieve a broad spectrum social upliftment.  In my
      view, our present policy is a little  lop-sided  with  heavy
      accent  on  urban development and lesser objectives on rural
      economy.  We are spending on millions of  Rupees  on  Atomic
      Energy  while  a  very  little  has been done to harness the
      rivers to yield hydro-electricity and irrigation. Many  pub-
      lic sectors and government agencies hog the national revenue
      pampering only a few urbanites, while  the  farmers  in  the
      country outback strive harder and harder with age old imple-
      ments. If the government  steps  forward  to  augment  these
      facilities and pump in more money to modernize the villages,
      it will help to employ and benefit the underprivileges.  May
      be  the  more  government participation in the rural economy
      will justify the government to  exercise  a  better  control
      over  the farmed goods and it will arrest the sporadic farm-
      ers unrest and the syndroms of present Punjab stalemate.


        May 15, 1985                    Pinaki Mazumder
                                Department of Computer Science
                               Illinois Institute of Technology
                                   Chicago, Illinois 60616