muppala@sunybcs.UUCP (Shankar Muppala) (11/23/85)
* This refers to article 10400005@uicsl by Pinaki Mazumdar. I have'nt seen a single communal riot in Bombay. May be trade-union riots. Basically people in Bombay are too busy for riots. I wonder Why he chose to mention Bombay.? Shankar ** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***
rao@cvl.UUCP (Kambhampati Subbarao) (11/25/85)
In article <2541@sunybcs.UUCP> muppala@sunybcs.UUCP (Shankar Muppala) writes: > This refers to article 10400005@uicsl by > Pinaki Mazumdar. I have'nt seen a single communal riot > in Bombay. May be trade-union riots. > With all due respect to the 'busy' Bombayites what should one call the Shivsena sponsored riots of mid-to-late seventies? However much I would like to believe that there atleast is one major metropolis free of communal tensions in India, I cannot agree with the blatantly false 'holier than thou' attitude the above letter conveys -- Arpa: rao@cvl