[net.sf-lovers] Another Example of "Science" Fiction

gsmith@brahms (Gene Ward Smith) (11/24/86)

Summary:

Expires:

Sender:

Followup-To:

Distribution:

Keywords:


In article <825@sdcc7.ucsd.EDU> ee162fck@sdcc7.ucsd.EDU (Jude Poole) writes:

>By far the best sentient computer novel I have ever come across is
>'The two Faces of Tommorrow' by the best hard-sf writer around
>today, James P. Hogan.

   Since I am afraid people are sick of this "hard" sf discussion, I
will content myself by pointing out the fact that Hogan is another good
source for the claim that the "science" in so-called "hard" sf is typic-
ally baloney.  In fact, Hogan makes blunders so stupid that he makes
Niven seem like "Physics Review" by comparison.

ucbvax!brahms!gsmith     Gene Ward Smith/UCB Math Dept/Berkeley CA 94720
"You and I as individuals can, by borrowing, live beyond our means, but
only for a limited period of time. Why should we think that collectively,
as a nation, we are not bound by that same limitation?" -- Ronald Reagan

ee161aba@sdcc18.ucsd.EDU (David L. Smith) (11/26/86)

Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: Another Example of "Science" Fiction
Summary: 
Expires: 
References: <4340@ut-ngp.UUCP> <825@sdcc7.ucsd.EDU> <416@cartan.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: 
Reply-To: ee161aba@sdcc18.ucsd.edu.UUCP (David L. Smith)
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Keywords: 

In article <416@cartan.Berkeley.EDU> gsmith@brahms.BERKELEY.EDU (Gene Ward Smith) writes:
 
     Since I am afraid people are sick of this "hard" sf discussion, I
  will content myself by pointing out the fact that Hogan is another good
  source for the claim that the "science" in so-called "hard" sf is typic-
  ally baloney.  In fact, Hogan makes blunders so stupid that he makes
  Niven seem like "Physics Review" by comparison.
 
  ucbvax!brahms!gsmith     Gene Ward Smith/UCB Math Dept/Berkeley CA 94720

Would you be so kind as to enlighten us poor imbeciles who just read 
the books to enjoy them rather than to pick them apart as to which authors
write to your specifications on scientific accuracy?  

			Thanks in advance
			David L. Smith
			sdcsvax!sdcc18!ee161aba