[net.news.stargate] stargate/censorship

andy@tmq.UUCP (Andrew H. Marrinson) (01/30/85)

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR GARBAGE ***

When I first read the dire WARNING implying that
stargate meant the end of unmoderated news groups,
and probably meant the end of unpopular or non-work-
related news groups, naturally I was upset.  Know I
don't know what to think.  While it is true that we
all have the option of continuing to go with UUCP,
there are some problems with this.  Purely from a
logistics standpoint, the disappearance of all or
most of the central "vortices" from the UUCP net
would probably permanently destroy any hope of
continuing more than "local" usenet via that facility.
(Obviously, the stargate sites won't drop off the
UUCP map entirely, but they will for the purpose
of forwarding old-style news.)

I have no objection to the basic premise of stargate,
or even the presumed moderation, as long as:

	1) I can still post what I want, when I
	   want (even if its logged).

	2) Ridiculous (seeming) news groups like
	   net.flame survive.

	3) There is no basic change in the "quality
	   of the news."  By this I mean the net
	   should retain its flavor as a forum of
	   individuals, and not become just a
	   collection of boring, dusty, old moderated
	   news groups.

End o' screed.
--
"I have a hard time dealing with reality.
 Fortunately I've managed to avoid it most of my adult life."

tmq Software/ICOM systems	Andrew H. Marrinson
1101 Lake-Cook Road		UUCP: ihnp4!tmq!andy
Buffalo Grove, IL 60090
-- 
"I have a hard time dealing with reality.
 Fortunately I've managed to avoid it most of my adult life."

tmq Software/ICOM systems	Andrew H. Marrinson
1101 Lake-Cook Road		UUCP: ihnp4!tmq!andy
Buffalo Grove, IL 60090