[net.politics.theory] Of Absolute Rightness

ncg@ukc.UUCP (N.C.Gale) (03/11/85)

>
#Arndt:
>> How do you KNOW that there is no 'right'????
>
#Terry Dineen   UUCP:  ...{yale,uw-beaver,decvax!wanginst}!apollo!rps
>Just a feeling I have.  I can't figure out what it means (practically) to say
>things like: "X is right" or "Y's have these rights".  Some say that men have
>an inalienable right to life; however men are alienated from their lives all 
> the time: death squads, electric chairs.  Where'd their "rights" go?


Some time ago, I wrote an article which was graced by criticism from all
quarters. And deservedly so.  For it mentioned a concept I got from
a senile & very public magistrate (ex-) Lord Denning: Natural Justice.

Natural Justice is Right. It is everything that every thinking person
can look at, and say: that is right.

So there is no Natural Justice. For every aspect of Justice that Western,
Christianity-based morality interpretes as clearly Right, there is a
Culture or Political Doctrine which doesn't.

Therefore, Right must be the Right of some arbitrary grouping of people:
one dictator, the majority of the people, octagenarians etc.
And no two countries will come to the same decisions.


-Nigel Gale